Difference between revisions of "Talk:First integral"
From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
(Possible mixup in references, consider a different book by Arnol'd.) |
(thank you) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
In chapter 2 section 10.5, page 125, Arnol'd explains this subject very clearly. | In chapter 2 section 10.5, page 125, Arnol'd explains this subject very clearly. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Thank you. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 19:28, 14 January 2015 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 18:28, 14 January 2015
The reference to Arnol'd is a bit misleading. Indeed Arnol'd writes about first integrals, but not in particular in the referenced book. A much better reference would be his book titled Ordinary Differential Equations. Consider as a reference: Arnol'd, V.I., Ordinary Differential Equations (New York, 1992)
In chapter 2 section 10.5, page 125, Arnol'd explains this subject very clearly.
- Thank you. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 19:28, 14 January 2015 (CET)
How to Cite This Entry:
First integral. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=First_integral&oldid=36261
First integral. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=First_integral&oldid=36261