Genetic Algorithms

Bold textGenetic Algorithms

1. Genetic algorithms (GAs): basic form

A generic GA (also know as an evolutionary algorithm [EA]) assumes a discrete search space H and a function

                                                 \[f:H\to\mathbb{R}\],                         

where H is a subsetof the Euclidean space\[\mathbb{R}\]. The general problem is to find

                                                 \[\arg\underset{X\in H}{\mathop{\min }}\,f\]

where X is avector of the decision variables and f is the objective function.

With GAs it is customary to distinguish genotype–the encoded representation of the variables–from phenotype–the set of variablesthemselves. The vector X is represented by a string (or chromosome) s of length l madeup of symbols drawn from an alphabet A using the mapping

                                                 \[c:{{A}^{l}}\to H\]

The mapping c is not necessarily surjective. The range of c determine the subset of Al available for exploration by a GA. The range of c, Ξ

                                                 \[\Xi\subseteq {{A}^{l}}\]

is needed to account for the fact that some strings in the image Al under c may represent invalid solutions to the original problem.

The string length l depends on the dimensions of both H and A, with the elements of the string corresponding to genes and the valuesto alleles. This statement of genes and alleles is often referred to as genotype-phenotype mapping.

Given the statements above, the optimization becomes:

                                        \[\arg\underset{S\in L}{\mathop{\min g}}\,\],

given the function

                                         \[g(s)=f(c(s))\].

Finally, with GAs it is helpful if c is a bijection. The important property of bijections as they applyto GAs is that bijections have an inverse, i.e., there is a unique vector x for every string and a unique stringfor each x.

2. Genetic algorithms and their operators

The following statements about the operators of GAs are adapted from Coello et al.(2002).

· Let H be a nonempty set (the individual or search space) · \[{{\left\{{{u}^{i}} \right\}}_{i\in \mathbb{N}}}\] a sequence in \[{{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}\] (the parent populations) · \[{{\left\{ {{u}^{'(i)}} \right\}}_{i\in\mathbb{N}}}\] a sequence in \[{{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}\](the offspring population sizes) · \[\phi :H\to \mathbb{R}\] a fitness function: \[\iota :\cup _{i=1}^{\infty}{{({{H}^{u}})}^{(i)}}\to \] {true, false} (the termination criteria) \[\chi\in \]{true, false} · r a sequence \[\left\{ {{r}^{(i)}} \right\}\] of recombination operators τ(i):\[X_{r}^{(i)}\to T(\Omega _{r}^{(i)},T\left( {{H}^{{{u}^{(i)}}}},{{H}^{u{{'}^{(i)}}}} \right))\] · m a sequence of {m(i)} of mutation operators in mi, \[X_{m}^{(i)}\ to T(\Omega _{m}^{(i)},T\left( {{H}^{{{u}^{(i)}}}},{{H}^{u{{'}^{(i)}}}} \right))\] · s a sequence of selection operators s(i):\[X_{s}^{(i)}\times T(H,\mathbb{R})\to T(\Omega _{s}^{(i)},T(({{H}^{u{{'}^{(i)+\chi {{\mu}^{(i)}}}}}}),{{H}^{{{\mu }^{(i+1)}}}}))\] · \[\Theta _{r}^{(i)}\in X_{r}^{(i)}\] (the recombination parameters) · \[\Theta _{m}^{(i)}\in X_{m}^{(i)}\] (the mutation parameters) · \[\Theta _{s}^{(i)}\in X_{s}^{(i)}\] (the selection parameters)

Coello et al. define the collection μ (thenumber of individuals) via Hμ.The population transforms are denoted by

                                     \[T:{{H}^{\mu }}\to {{H}^{\mu }}\]

where

                                     \[\mu \in \mathbb{N}\]

However, some GA methods generate populationswhose size is not equal to their predecessors’. In a more general framework

                                     \[T:{{H}^{\mu}}\to {{H}^{{{\mu }'}}}\]

can accommodate populations that contain the same ordifferent individuals. This mapping has the ability to represent all populationsizes, genetic operators, and parameters as sequences.

The execution of a GA typically begins by randomly sampling with replacement from Al. The resulting collection is the initial population, denoted by P(0). In general, a population is a collection \[P=({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}},...,{{a}_{\mu }})\]of individuals, where\[{{a}_{i}}\in {{A}^{l}}\], and populations are treated as n-tuples of individuals. The number of individuals (μ) is defined as the population size. Adating he work of Lamont and Merkle (Lamont, 1997) we can define the termination criteria and the other genetic operators (GOs) in more detail. Since H is a nonempty set,\[c:{{A}^{l}}\to H\], and\[f:H\to \mathbb{R}\], the fitness scaling function can be defined as \[{{T}_{s}}:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}\]and a related fitness function as\[\Phi \triangleq {{T}_{s}}\circ f\circ c\]. In this definition it is understood that the objective function f is determined by the application, while the specification of the decoding function c[1] and and the fitness scaling function Ts are design issues.

[1] Remember that if the domain of c is total, i.e., the domain of c is all of A I,c is called a decoding function. The mapping of c isnot necessarily surjective. The range of c determines the subset of Alavailable forexploration by the evolutionary algorithm.