Difference between revisions of "Talk:Absolute continuity"
From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
(Why not) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
: Why not? --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 13:21, 30 July 2012 (CEST) | : Why not? --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 13:21, 30 July 2012 (CEST) | ||
| + | : Fine by me [[User:Camillo.delellis|Camillo]] 14:08, 30 July 2012 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 12:08, 30 July 2012
I moved some portions of the old article in Signed measure. I have not had the time to add all Mathscinet and Zentralblatt references. Camillo 22:54, 29 July 2012 (CEST)
Could I suggest using $\lambda$ rather than $\mathcal L$ for Lebesgue measure since
- it is very commonly used, almost standard
- it would be consistent with the notation for a general measure, $\mu$
- calligraphic is being used already for $\sigma$-algebras
--Jjg 12:57, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
- Why not? --Boris Tsirelson 13:21, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
- Fine by me Camillo 14:08, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
How to Cite This Entry:
Absolute continuity. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Absolute_continuity&oldid=27249
Absolute continuity. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Absolute_continuity&oldid=27249