Difference between revisions of "Universal behaviour in dynamical systems"
(Importing text file) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (MR/ZBL numbers added) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
For <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565024.png" /> (when <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565025.png" /> is sometimes called the Feigenbaum mapping), statement i) holds, but with <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565026.png" /> ranging over all non-negative integers, and ii) holds for each <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565027.png" />; furthermore, the following analogue of iii) holds: | For <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565024.png" /> (when <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565025.png" /> is sometimes called the Feigenbaum mapping), statement i) holds, but with <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565026.png" /> ranging over all non-negative integers, and ii) holds for each <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565027.png" />; furthermore, the following analogue of iii) holds: | ||
− | iv) (for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565028.png" />) the closure of the orbit of the turning point <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565029.png" /> is a Cantor set <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565030.png" />, which is the asymptotic limit of every orbit not landing on one of the periodic orbits <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565031.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565032.png" />. The restricted mapping <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565033.png" /> is a minimal homeomorphism (the | + | iv) (for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565028.png" />) the closure of the orbit of the turning point <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565029.png" /> is a Cantor set <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565030.png" />, which is the asymptotic limit of every orbit not landing on one of the periodic orbits <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565031.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565032.png" />. The restricted mapping <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565033.png" /> is a minimal homeomorphism (the "adding machine for chaos in a dynamical systemadding machine" ). |
− | Finally, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565034.png" /> is the threshold of | + | Finally, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565034.png" /> is the threshold of "chaos" , in the following sense: |
v) for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565035.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565036.png" /> has infinitely many distinct periodic orbits, and positive topological entropy. | v) for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565035.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565036.png" /> has infinitely many distinct periodic orbits, and positive topological entropy. | ||
− | Many features of this | + | Many features of this "topological" , or combinatorial picture were understood by early researchers in this area, specifically P.J. Myrberg [[#References|[a12]]] and N. Metropolis, M.L. Stein and P.R. Stein [[#References|[a13]]]. They recognized as well that the combinatorial structure of the periodic orbits <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565037.png" /> is rigidly determined by the fact that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565038.png" /> is unimodal (cf. [[#References|[a14]]]). In essence, the statements above can be formulated for any family of unimodal mappings (cf. ). In fact, the (weak) monotonicity of the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565039.png" />'s, together with the fact that if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565040.png" />, then <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565041.png" /> must have periodic orbits of least period <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565042.png" /> for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565043.png" /> (some <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565044.png" />) and no others, follows for any family of continuous mappings on the line from Sharkovskii's theorem [[#References|[a16]]], [[#References|[a2]]]; recent work has yielded a more general understanding of the combinatorial structure of periodic orbits for continuous mappings in dimension <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565045.png" /> (cf. [[#References|[a1]]]). |
Coullet, Tresser and Feigenbaum added to the topological picture described above a number of analytic and geometric features: | Coullet, Tresser and Feigenbaum added to the topological picture described above a number of analytic and geometric features: | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565051.png" /></td> </tr></table> | <table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565051.png" /></td> </tr></table> | ||
− | These statements, formulated for the particular family <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565052.png" /> of quadratic mappings, are technically interesting, but not so striking. However, they observed that v)–vii) hold for a very broad class of unimodal one-parameter families, subject only to trivial | + | These statements, formulated for the particular family <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565052.png" /> of quadratic mappings, are technically interesting, but not so striking. However, they observed that v)–vii) hold for a very broad class of unimodal one-parameter families, subject only to trivial "fullness" conditions (essentially that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565053.png" /> has only finitely many periodic orbits while <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565054.png" /> has positive entropy) and smoothness (essentially that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565055.png" /> is <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565056.png" /> and each <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565057.png" /> has a non-degenerate critical point). And, sensationally, the constants <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565058.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565059.png" /> are independent of the family <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565060.png" />. |
In [[#References|[a6]]] and | In [[#References|[a6]]] and | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
these assertions were reduced, using ideas from renormalization theory, to certain technical conjectures concerning a doubling operator <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565061.png" /> acting on an appropriate function space. O. Lanford | these assertions were reduced, using ideas from renormalization theory, to certain technical conjectures concerning a doubling operator <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565061.png" /> acting on an appropriate function space. O. Lanford | ||
− | (cf. also [[#References|[a3]]], [[#References|[a5]]]) gave a rigorous, computer-assisted proof of the basic conjecture, that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565062.png" /> has a saddle-type fixed point with one characteristic multiplier <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565063.png" /> (the same as in vi)) and stable manifold of codimension <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565064.png" />. D. Sullivan [[#References|[a17]]] showed the uniqueness of this fixed point in the space of | + | (cf. also [[#References|[a3]]], [[#References|[a5]]]) gave a rigorous, computer-assisted proof of the basic conjecture, that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565062.png" /> has a saddle-type fixed point with one characteristic multiplier <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565063.png" /> (the same as in vi)) and stable manifold of codimension <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565064.png" />. D. Sullivan [[#References|[a17]]] showed the uniqueness of this fixed point in the space of "quadratic-like" mappings. The final conjecture, concerning transversality of the stable manifold with certain bifurcation submanifolds, remains unproved. Recently, Sullivan , introducing a number of new ideas, has circumvented this difficulty and provided a rather complete theory of universal features for families of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565065.png" /> unimodal mappings. In particular, the asymptotic geometry of the Cantor set <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565066.png" /> (for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565067.png" />) and of analogous sets appearing at other "threshold" parameter values (the "infinitely renormalizable mappings of bounded type" ) is universal; for example, the set <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565068.png" /> always has [[Hausdorff dimension|Hausdorff dimension]] <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565069.png" />. Full expositions of this theory are provided in [[#References|[a18]]] and [[#References|[a7]]]. |
These ideas have been applied as well to circle diffeomorphisms [[#References|[a10]]], | These ideas have been applied as well to circle diffeomorphisms [[#References|[a10]]], | ||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
− | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> | + | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> Ll. Alsedà, J. Llibre, M. Misiurewicz, "Combinatorial dynamics and entropy in one dimension" (to appear)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L. Block, J. Guckenheimer, M. Misiurewicz, L.-S. Young, "Periodic points and topological entropy of one dimensional maps" Z. Nitecki (ed.) C. Robinson (ed.) , ''Global theory of dynamical systems (Proc. Northwestern Univ., 1979)'' , ''Lect. notes in math.'' , '''819''' , Springer (1980) pp. 18–34 {{MR|0591173}} {{ZBL|0447.58028}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Campanino, H. Epstein, D. Ruelle, "On the existence of Feigenbaum's fixed point" ''Comm. Math. Phys.'' , '''79''' (1981) pp. 261–302 {{MR|612250}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. Collet, J.-P. Eckmann, H. Koch, "On universality for area-preserving maps of the plane" ''Physica'' , '''3D''' (1981) pp. 457–467 {{MR|0631180}} {{ZBL|1194.37050}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. Collet, J.-P. Eckmann, O. Lanford, "Universal properties of maps on an interval" ''Comm. Math. Phys.'' , '''76''' (1980) pp. 211–254 {{MR|0588048}} {{ZBL|0455.58024}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. Coullet, C. Tresser, "Itérations d'endomorphismes et groupe de rénormalisation" ''J. Phys.'' , '''C5''' (1978) pp. 25–28 {{MR|0512110}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a7]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W. de Mello, S. van Strien, "One-dimensional dynamics" (to appear)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a8a]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Feigenbaum, "Quantitative universality for a class of non-linear transformations" ''J. Stat. Phys.'' , '''19''' (1978) pp. 25–52 {{MR|501179}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a8b]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Feigenbaum, "The universal metric properties of a non-linear transformation" ''J. Stat. Phys.'' , '''21''' (1979) pp. 669–706 {{MR|555919}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a9a]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L. Jonker, D. Rand, "Bifurcations in one dimension" ''Invent. Math.'' , '''62''' (1981) pp. 347–365 {{MR|0608525}} {{MR|0604832}} {{ZBL|0475.58015}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a9b]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L. Jonker, D. Rand, "Bifurcations in one dimension" ''Invent. Math.'' , '''63''' (1981) pp. 1–16 {{MR|0608525}} {{MR|0604832}} {{ZBL|0475.58015}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a10]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L. Jonker, D. Rand, "Universal properties of maps of the circle with <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565070.png" />-singularities" ''Comm. Math. Phys.'' , '''90''' (1983) pp. 273–292 {{MR|714439}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a11a]</TD> <TD valign="top"> O. Lanford, "A computer-assisted proof of the Feigenbaum conjectures" ''Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.'' , '''6''' (1982) pp. 427–434 {{MR|0648529}} {{ZBL|0487.58017}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a11b]</TD> <TD valign="top"> O.E. Lanford, "Computer assisted proofs in analysis" A.M. Gleason (ed.) , ''Proc. Internat. Congress Mathematicians (Berkeley, 1986)'' , Amer. Math. Soc. (1987) pp. 1385–1394 {{MR|0934342}} {{ZBL|0676.65039}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a12]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P.J. Myrberg, "Sur l'iteration des polynomes réels quadratiques" ''J. Math. Pures Appl.'' , '''41''' (1962) pp. 339–351 {{MR|0161968}} {{ZBL|0106.04703}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a13]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N. Metropolis, M.L. Stein, P.R. Stein, "On finite limit sets for transformations on the unit interval" ''J. Comb. Theory'' , '''15A''' (1973) pp. 25–44 {{MR|0316636}} {{ZBL|0259.26003}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a14]</TD> <TD valign="top"> W. Thurston, "On iterated maps of the interval" J.C. Alexander (ed.) , ''Dynamical Systems (Proc. Maryland, 1986–7)'' , ''Lect. notes in math.'' , '''1342''' , Springer (1988) pp. 465–563 {{MR|0970571}} {{ZBL|0664.58015}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a15a]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Rand, "Universality and renormalization in dynamical systems" T. Bedford (ed.) J. W. Swift (ed.) , ''New directions in dynamical systems'' , Cambridge Univ. Press (1987) pp. 1–56</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a15b]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Rand, "Global phase space universality, smooth conjugacies and renormalisation: the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/u/u095/u095650/u09565071.png" /> case." ''Nonlinearity'' , '''1''' (1988) pp. 181–202 {{MR|928952}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a16]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A.N. Sharkovskii, "Coexistence of cycles of a continuous map of the line into itself" ''Ukrain. Mat. Zh.'' , '''16''' (1964) pp. 61–71 (In Russian) {{MR|1415876}} {{MR|1361914}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a17]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Sullivan, "Quasiconformal homeomorphisms in dynamics, topology and geometry" A.M. Gleason (ed.) , ''Proc. Internat. Congress Mathematicians (Berkeley, 1986)'' , Amer. Math. Soc. (1987) pp. 1216–1228 {{MR|0934326}} {{ZBL|0698.58030}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a18]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Sullivan, "Bounds, quadratic differentials, and renormalization conjectures" , ''Centennial Publ.'' , '''2''' , Amer. Math. Soc. (1991) {{MR|1184622}} {{ZBL|0936.37016}} </TD></TR></table> |
Revision as of 17:02, 15 April 2012
In the late 1970's, P. Coullet and C. Tresser [a6] and M. Feigenbaum
independently found striking, unexpected features of the transition from simple to chaotic dynamics in one-dimensional dynamical systems (cf. also Routes to chaos). By the example of the family of quadratic mappings acting (for
) on the interval
, the period-doubling scenario is recalled here. For
,
has periodic points of every (least) period. Let
be the infimum of parameter values
for which
has a periodic orbit of least period
. Then
![]() |
and
![]() |
For , the dynamics of
is described by statements i)–iii) below.
i) has precisely one periodic orbit
of (least) period
for each
, and no other periodic orbits;
ii) any pair of adjacent points in is separated by a unique point in
;
iii) with the exception of the (countably many) orbits which land on some ,
, and stay there, every
-orbit tends asymptotically to
.
For (when
is sometimes called the Feigenbaum mapping), statement i) holds, but with
ranging over all non-negative integers, and ii) holds for each
; furthermore, the following analogue of iii) holds:
iv) (for ) the closure of the orbit of the turning point
is a Cantor set
, which is the asymptotic limit of every orbit not landing on one of the periodic orbits
,
. The restricted mapping
is a minimal homeomorphism (the "adding machine for chaos in a dynamical systemadding machine" ).
Finally, is the threshold of "chaos" , in the following sense:
v) for ,
has infinitely many distinct periodic orbits, and positive topological entropy.
Many features of this "topological" , or combinatorial picture were understood by early researchers in this area, specifically P.J. Myrberg [a12] and N. Metropolis, M.L. Stein and P.R. Stein [a13]. They recognized as well that the combinatorial structure of the periodic orbits is rigidly determined by the fact that
is unimodal (cf. [a14]). In essence, the statements above can be formulated for any family of unimodal mappings (cf. ). In fact, the (weak) monotonicity of the
's, together with the fact that if
, then
must have periodic orbits of least period
for
(some
) and no others, follows for any family of continuous mappings on the line from Sharkovskii's theorem [a16], [a2]; recent work has yielded a more general understanding of the combinatorial structure of periodic orbits for continuous mappings in dimension
(cf. [a1]).
Coullet, Tresser and Feigenbaum added to the topological picture described above a number of analytic and geometric features:
vi) the convergence is asymptotically geometric:
![]() |
vii) the periodic orbits scale: let denote the orbit
for
; then
![]() |
These statements, formulated for the particular family of quadratic mappings, are technically interesting, but not so striking. However, they observed that v)–vii) hold for a very broad class of unimodal one-parameter families, subject only to trivial "fullness" conditions (essentially that
has only finitely many periodic orbits while
has positive entropy) and smoothness (essentially that
is
and each
has a non-degenerate critical point). And, sensationally, the constants
and
are independent of the family
.
In [a6] and
these assertions were reduced, using ideas from renormalization theory, to certain technical conjectures concerning a doubling operator acting on an appropriate function space. O. Lanford
(cf. also [a3], [a5]) gave a rigorous, computer-assisted proof of the basic conjecture, that has a saddle-type fixed point with one characteristic multiplier
(the same as in vi)) and stable manifold of codimension
. D. Sullivan [a17] showed the uniqueness of this fixed point in the space of "quadratic-like" mappings. The final conjecture, concerning transversality of the stable manifold with certain bifurcation submanifolds, remains unproved. Recently, Sullivan , introducing a number of new ideas, has circumvented this difficulty and provided a rather complete theory of universal features for families of
unimodal mappings. In particular, the asymptotic geometry of the Cantor set
(for
) and of analogous sets appearing at other "threshold" parameter values (the "infinitely renormalizable mappings of bounded type" ) is universal; for example, the set
always has Hausdorff dimension
. Full expositions of this theory are provided in [a18] and [a7].
These ideas have been applied as well to circle diffeomorphisms [a10],
and area-preserving planar diffeomorphisms [a4], .
References
[a1] | Ll. Alsedà, J. Llibre, M. Misiurewicz, "Combinatorial dynamics and entropy in one dimension" (to appear) |
[a2] | L. Block, J. Guckenheimer, M. Misiurewicz, L.-S. Young, "Periodic points and topological entropy of one dimensional maps" Z. Nitecki (ed.) C. Robinson (ed.) , Global theory of dynamical systems (Proc. Northwestern Univ., 1979) , Lect. notes in math. , 819 , Springer (1980) pp. 18–34 MR0591173 Zbl 0447.58028 |
[a3] | M. Campanino, H. Epstein, D. Ruelle, "On the existence of Feigenbaum's fixed point" Comm. Math. Phys. , 79 (1981) pp. 261–302 MR612250 |
[a4] | P. Collet, J.-P. Eckmann, H. Koch, "On universality for area-preserving maps of the plane" Physica , 3D (1981) pp. 457–467 MR0631180 Zbl 1194.37050 |
[a5] | P. Collet, J.-P. Eckmann, O. Lanford, "Universal properties of maps on an interval" Comm. Math. Phys. , 76 (1980) pp. 211–254 MR0588048 Zbl 0455.58024 |
[a6] | P. Coullet, C. Tresser, "Itérations d'endomorphismes et groupe de rénormalisation" J. Phys. , C5 (1978) pp. 25–28 MR0512110 |
[a7] | W. de Mello, S. van Strien, "One-dimensional dynamics" (to appear) |
[a8a] | M. Feigenbaum, "Quantitative universality for a class of non-linear transformations" J. Stat. Phys. , 19 (1978) pp. 25–52 MR501179 |
[a8b] | M. Feigenbaum, "The universal metric properties of a non-linear transformation" J. Stat. Phys. , 21 (1979) pp. 669–706 MR555919 |
[a9a] | L. Jonker, D. Rand, "Bifurcations in one dimension" Invent. Math. , 62 (1981) pp. 347–365 MR0608525 MR0604832 Zbl 0475.58015 |
[a9b] | L. Jonker, D. Rand, "Bifurcations in one dimension" Invent. Math. , 63 (1981) pp. 1–16 MR0608525 MR0604832 Zbl 0475.58015 |
[a10] | L. Jonker, D. Rand, "Universal properties of maps of the circle with ![]() |
[a11a] | O. Lanford, "A computer-assisted proof of the Feigenbaum conjectures" Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. , 6 (1982) pp. 427–434 MR0648529 Zbl 0487.58017 |
[a11b] | O.E. Lanford, "Computer assisted proofs in analysis" A.M. Gleason (ed.) , Proc. Internat. Congress Mathematicians (Berkeley, 1986) , Amer. Math. Soc. (1987) pp. 1385–1394 MR0934342 Zbl 0676.65039 |
[a12] | P.J. Myrberg, "Sur l'iteration des polynomes réels quadratiques" J. Math. Pures Appl. , 41 (1962) pp. 339–351 MR0161968 Zbl 0106.04703 |
[a13] | N. Metropolis, M.L. Stein, P.R. Stein, "On finite limit sets for transformations on the unit interval" J. Comb. Theory , 15A (1973) pp. 25–44 MR0316636 Zbl 0259.26003 |
[a14] | W. Thurston, "On iterated maps of the interval" J.C. Alexander (ed.) , Dynamical Systems (Proc. Maryland, 1986–7) , Lect. notes in math. , 1342 , Springer (1988) pp. 465–563 MR0970571 Zbl 0664.58015 |
[a15a] | D. Rand, "Universality and renormalization in dynamical systems" T. Bedford (ed.) J. W. Swift (ed.) , New directions in dynamical systems , Cambridge Univ. Press (1987) pp. 1–56 |
[a15b] | D. Rand, "Global phase space universality, smooth conjugacies and renormalisation: the ![]() |
[a16] | A.N. Sharkovskii, "Coexistence of cycles of a continuous map of the line into itself" Ukrain. Mat. Zh. , 16 (1964) pp. 61–71 (In Russian) MR1415876 MR1361914 |
[a17] | D. Sullivan, "Quasiconformal homeomorphisms in dynamics, topology and geometry" A.M. Gleason (ed.) , Proc. Internat. Congress Mathematicians (Berkeley, 1986) , Amer. Math. Soc. (1987) pp. 1216–1228 MR0934326 Zbl 0698.58030 |
[a18] | D. Sullivan, "Bounds, quadratic differentials, and renormalization conjectures" , Centennial Publ. , 2 , Amer. Math. Soc. (1991) MR1184622 Zbl 0936.37016 |
Universal behaviour in dynamical systems. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Universal_behaviour_in_dynamical_systems&oldid=24587