Difference between revisions of "Genetic Algorithms"
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
A generic GA (also known as an evolutionary algorithm [EA]) assumes a discrete search space ''Italic text H'' and a function | A generic GA (also known as an evolutionary algorithm [EA]) assumes a discrete search space ''Italic text H'' and a function | ||
− | + | \[f:H\to\mathbb{R}\], | |
where ''Italic text H'' is a subset of the Euclidean space ''Italic text R''. | where ''Italic text H'' is a subset of the Euclidean space ''Italic text R''. | ||
The general problem is to find | The general problem is to find | ||
− | + | \[\arg\underset{X\in H}{\mathop{\min }}\,f\] | |
where ''Italic text''X | where ''Italic text''X | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
With GAs it is customary to distinguish genotype–the encoded representation of the variables–from phenotype–the set of variables themselves. The vector ''Italic text'' X is represented by a string (or chromosome) ''Italic text'' s of length ''Italic text'' l madeup of symbols drawn from an alphabet ''Italic text'' A using the mapping | With GAs it is customary to distinguish genotype–the encoded representation of the variables–from phenotype–the set of variables themselves. The vector ''Italic text'' X is represented by a string (or chromosome) ''Italic text'' s of length ''Italic text'' l madeup of symbols drawn from an alphabet ''Italic text'' A using the mapping | ||
− | + | \[c:{{A}^{l}}\to H\] | |
The mapping ''Italic text'' c is not necessarily surjective. The range of ''Italic text'' c determine the subset of ''Italic text''<sup>Superscript text</sup> Al available for exploration by a GA. The range of ''Italic text'' c, ''Italic text'' Ξ | The mapping ''Italic text'' c is not necessarily surjective. The range of ''Italic text'' c determine the subset of ''Italic text''<sup>Superscript text</sup> Al available for exploration by a GA. The range of ''Italic text'' c, ''Italic text'' Ξ | ||
− | + | \[\Xi\subseteq {{A}^{l}}\] | |
is needed to account for the fact that some strings in the image ''Italic text''<sup>Superscript text</sup> Al under ''Italic text'' c may represent invalid solutions to the original problem. | is needed to account for the fact that some strings in the image ''Italic text''<sup>Superscript text</sup> Al under ''Italic text'' c may represent invalid solutions to the original problem. | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Given the statements above, the optimization becomes: | Given the statements above, the optimization becomes: | ||
− | + | \[\arg\underset{S\in L}{\mathop{\min g}}\,\], | |
given the function | given the function | ||
− | + | \[g(s)=f(c(s))\]. | |
Finally, with GAs it is helpful if ''Italic text'' c is a bijection. The important property of bijections as they apply to GAs is that bijections have an inverse, i.e., there is a unique vector ''Italic text'' x for every string and a unique string for each ''Italic text'' x. | Finally, with GAs it is helpful if ''Italic text'' c is a bijection. The important property of bijections as they apply to GAs is that bijections have an inverse, i.e., there is a unique vector ''Italic text'' x for every string and a unique string for each ''Italic text'' x. | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
Define the collection ''Italic text''μ (the number of individuals) via <sub>Subscript text</sub>''Italic text''Hμ. The population transforms are denoted by | Define the collection ''Italic text''μ (the number of individuals) via <sub>Subscript text</sub>''Italic text''Hμ. The population transforms are denoted by | ||
− | + | \[T:{{H}^{\mu }}\to {{H}^{\mu }}\] | |
where \[\mu \in \mathbb{N}\ of recombination operators τ(i) : \[X_{r}^{(i)}\ to T(\Omega _{r}^{(i)},T\left( {{H}^{{{u}^{(i)}}}},{{H}^{u{{'}^{(i)}}}} \right))\], m a sequence of {m(i)} of mutation operators in mi, \[X_{m}^{(i)}\to T(\Omega _{m}^{(i)},T\left({{H}^{{{u}^{(i)}}}},{{H}^{u{{'}^{(i)}}}} \right))\], s a sequence of {si} selection operators s(i): \[X_{s}^{(i)}\timesT(H,\mathbb{R})\to T(\Omega _{s}^{(i)},T(({{H}^{u{{'}^{(i)+\chi {{\mu}^{(i)}}}}}}),{{H}^{{{\mu }^{(i+1)}}}}))\], \[\Theta _{r}^{(i)}\ in X_{r}^{(i)}\] (the recombination parameters), \[\Theta _{m}^{(i)}\\in X_{m}^{(i)}\] (the mutation parameters), and \[\Theta _{s}^{(i)}\ in X_{s}^{(i)}\] (the selection parameters). | where \[\mu \in \mathbb{N}\ of recombination operators τ(i) : \[X_{r}^{(i)}\ to T(\Omega _{r}^{(i)},T\left( {{H}^{{{u}^{(i)}}}},{{H}^{u{{'}^{(i)}}}} \right))\], m a sequence of {m(i)} of mutation operators in mi, \[X_{m}^{(i)}\to T(\Omega _{m}^{(i)},T\left({{H}^{{{u}^{(i)}}}},{{H}^{u{{'}^{(i)}}}} \right))\], s a sequence of {si} selection operators s(i): \[X_{s}^{(i)}\timesT(H,\mathbb{R})\to T(\Omega _{s}^{(i)},T(({{H}^{u{{'}^{(i)+\chi {{\mu}^{(i)}}}}}}),{{H}^{{{\mu }^{(i+1)}}}}))\], \[\Theta _{r}^{(i)}\ in X_{r}^{(i)}\] (the recombination parameters), \[\Theta _{m}^{(i)}\\in X_{m}^{(i)}\] (the mutation parameters), and \[\Theta _{s}^{(i)}\ in X_{s}^{(i)}\] (the selection parameters). | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
To account for the cases where populations whose size not equal to their predecessors’, the following expression | To account for the cases where populations whose size not equal to their predecessors’, the following expression | ||
− | + | \[T:{{H}^{\mu}}\to {{H}^{{{\mu }'}}}\] | |
accommodates populations that contain the same or different individuals. This mapping has the ability to represent all population sizes, genetic operators, and parameters as sequences. | accommodates populations that contain the same or different individuals. This mapping has the ability to represent all population sizes, genetic operators, and parameters as sequences. | ||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
The execution of a GA typically begins by random sampling with replacement from <sup>Superscript text</sup>''Italic text''Al. The resulting collection is the initial population, denoted by ''Italic text'' P(0). In general, a population is a collection \[P=({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}},...,{{a}_{\mu }})\]of individuals,where\[{{a}_{i}}\in {{A}^{l}}\],and populations are treated as n-tuples of individuals. The number of individuals (''Italic text μ") is defined as the population size. | The execution of a GA typically begins by random sampling with replacement from <sup>Superscript text</sup>''Italic text''Al. The resulting collection is the initial population, denoted by ''Italic text'' P(0). In general, a population is a collection \[P=({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}},...,{{a}_{\mu }})\]of individuals,where\[{{a}_{i}}\in {{A}^{l}}\],and populations are treated as n-tuples of individuals. The number of individuals (''Italic text μ") is defined as the population size. | ||
− | Following Lamont and Merkle (Lamont, 1997) the termination criteria and the other genetic operators(GOs)will be defined in more detail. | + | Following upon the work of Lamont and Merkle (Lamont, 1997) and others, the termination criteria and the other genetic operators(GOs)will be defined in more detail. |
− | Since ''Italic text''H is a nonempty set,\[c:{{A}^{l}}\to H\], and\[f:H\to \mathbb{R}\], the fitness scaling function can be defined as \[{{T}_{s}}:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}\]and a related fitness function as\[\Phi \triangleq {{T}_{s}}\circ f\circ c\]. In this definition it is understood that the objective function ''Italic text''f is determined by the application, while the specification of the decoding function ''Italic text''c[1] and the fitness scaling function <sup>Subscript text</sup>''Italic text''Ts are design issues. | + | Since ''Italic text''H is a nonempty set,\[c:{{A}^{l}}\to H\], and \[f:H\to \mathbb{R}\], the fitness scaling function can be defined as \[{{T}_{s}}:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}\]and a related fitness function as\[\Phi \triangleq {{T}_{s}}\circ f\circ c\]. In this definition it is understood that the objective function ''Italic text''f is determined by the application, while the specification of the decoding function ''Italic text''c[1] and the fitness scaling function <sup>Subscript text</sup>''Italic text''Ts are design issues. |
− | + | After initialization, the execution proceeds iteratively. Each iteration consists of an application of one or more GOs. The combined effect of the GOs applied in a particular generation $t\in N$ is a transformation of the current population ''Italic text''P(t) into a new population ''Italic text''P(t+1). | |
− | P(t) into a new population ''Italic text''P(t+1). | ||
− | In the population transformation $\mu ,{\mu}'\ in {{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}$(the parent and offspring population sizes, respectively). A mapping $T:{{H}^{\mu }}\ to {{H}^{{{\mu }'}}}$ is called a population transformation (''Italic text''PT). If $T(P)={P}'$, then ''Italic text''P is | + | In the population transformation $\mu ,{\mu}'\ in {{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}$(the parent and offspring population sizes, respectively). A mapping $T:{{H}^{\mu }}\ to {{H}^{{{\mu }'}}}$ is called a population transformation (''Italic text''PT). If $T(P)={P}'$, then ''Italic text''P is the parent population and <sup>Superscript text</sup>''Italic text''P/ the offspring population. If $\mu ={\mu }'$,then it is called the population size. |
− | The ''Italic text''PT resulting from | + | The ''Italic text''PT resulting from a GO often depends on the outcome of a random experiment. This result is referred to as a random population transformation (''Italic text''RPT or random PT). To define ''Italic text''RPT, let $\mu \in {{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}$and $\Omega $ be a set (the sample space). A random function $R:\Omega \to T({{H}{\mu }},\bigcup\limits_{{\mu }'\ in {{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}}^{{}}{{{H}^{{{\mu }'}}}})$ is called a ''Italic text''RPT. The distribution of ''Italic text''PTs resulting from the application of a GO depends on the operator parameters; in other words, a GO maps its parameters to a ''Italic text''RPT. |
− | Now that both the fitness function and ''Italic text''RPT have been defined, | + | Now that both the fitness function and ''Italic text''RPT have been defined, let$\mu \in {{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}$, ''Italic text''X be a set (the parameter space) and $\Omega $ a set. The mapping $\Zeta :X\to T\left( \Omega ,T\left[ {{H}^{\mu }},\bigcup\limits_{{\mu }'\in {{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}}^{{}}{{{H}^{{{\mu}'}}}} \right] \right)$ is a GO. The set of GOs is denoted as $GAOP\left( H,\mu ,X,\Omega \right)$. |
Revision as of 22:23, 18 August 2012
Bold text Genetic Algorithms
1. Genetic algorithms (GAs): basic form
A generic GA (also known as an evolutionary algorithm [EA]) assumes a discrete search space Italic text H and a function
\[f:H\to\mathbb{R}\],
where Italic text H is a subset of the Euclidean space Italic text R.
The general problem is to find
\[\arg\underset{X\in H}{\mathop{\min }}\,f\]
where Italic textX
is a vector of the decision variables and Italic text f is the objective function.
With GAs it is customary to distinguish genotype–the encoded representation of the variables–from phenotype–the set of variables themselves. The vector Italic text X is represented by a string (or chromosome) Italic text s of length Italic text l madeup of symbols drawn from an alphabet Italic text A using the mapping
\[c:{{A}^{l}}\to H\]
The mapping Italic text c is not necessarily surjective. The range of Italic text c determine the subset of Italic textSuperscript text Al available for exploration by a GA. The range of Italic text c, Italic text Ξ
\[\Xi\subseteq {{A}^{l}}\]
is needed to account for the fact that some strings in the image Italic textSuperscript text Al under Italic text c may represent invalid solutions to the original problem.
The string length Italic text l depends on the dimensions of both Italic text H and Italic textSuperscript text Al, with the elements of the string corresponding to genes and the values to alleles. This statement of genes and alleles is often referred to as genotype-phenotype mapping.
Given the statements above, the optimization becomes:
\[\arg\underset{S\in L}{\mathop{\min g}}\,\],
given the function
\[g(s)=f(c(s))\].
Finally, with GAs it is helpful if Italic text c is a bijection. The important property of bijections as they apply to GAs is that bijections have an inverse, i.e., there is a unique vector Italic text x for every string and a unique string for each Italic text x.
2. Genetic algorithms and their Operators
Let H be a nonempty set (the individual or search space)\[{{\left\{{{u}^{i}} \right\}}_{i\ in \mathbb{N}}}\] a sequence in \[{{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}\] (the parent populations). \[{{\left\{ {{u}^{'(i)}} \right\}}_{i\in \mathbb{N}}}\] a sequence in \[{{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}\](the offspring population sizes), \[\phi:H\to \mathbb{R}\]a fitness function, \[\iota :\cup _{i=1}^{\infty}{{({{H}^{u}})}^{(i)}}\to\]{true,false} (the termination criteria), \[\chi\in\]{true, false}, r a sequence \[\left\{{{r}^{(i)}} \right\}\]
Define the collection Italic textμ (the number of individuals) via Subscript textItalic textHμ. The population transforms are denoted by
\[T:{{H}^{\mu }}\to {{H}^{\mu }}\]
where \[\mu \in \mathbb{N}\ of recombination operators τ(i) : \[X_{r}^{(i)}\ to T(\Omega _{r}^{(i)},T\left( {{H}^{{{u}^{(i)}}}},{{H}^{u{{'}^{(i)}}}} \right))\], m a sequence of {m(i)} of mutation operators in mi, \[X_{m}^{(i)}\to T(\Omega _{m}^{(i)},T\left({{H}^{{{u}^{(i)}}}},{{H}^{u{{'}^{(i)}}}} \right))\], s a sequence of {si} selection operators s(i): \[X_{s}^{(i)}\timesT(H,\mathbb{R})\to T(\Omega _{s}^{(i)},T(({{H}^{u{{'}^{(i)+\chi {{\mu}^{(i)}}}}}}),{{H}^{{{\mu }^{(i+1)}}}}))\], \[\Theta _{r}^{(i)}\ in X_{r}^{(i)}\] (the recombination parameters), \[\Theta _{m}^{(i)}\\in X_{m}^{(i)}\] (the mutation parameters), and \[\Theta _{s}^{(i)}\ in X_{s}^{(i)}\] (the selection parameters).
To account for the cases where populations whose size not equal to their predecessors’, the following expression
\[T:{{H}^{\mu}}\to {{H}^{{{\mu }'}}}\]
accommodates populations that contain the same or different individuals. This mapping has the ability to represent all population sizes, genetic operators, and parameters as sequences.
The execution of a GA typically begins by random sampling with replacement from Superscript textItalic textAl. The resulting collection is the initial population, denoted by Italic text P(0). In general, a population is a collection \[P=({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}},...,{{a}_{\mu }})\]of individuals,where\[{{a}_{i}}\in {{A}^{l}}\],and populations are treated as n-tuples of individuals. The number of individuals (Italic text μ") is defined as the population size.
Following upon the work of Lamont and Merkle (Lamont, 1997) and others, the termination criteria and the other genetic operators(GOs)will be defined in more detail.
Since Italic textH is a nonempty set,\[c:{{A}^{l}}\to H\], and \[f:H\to \mathbb{R}\], the fitness scaling function can be defined as \[{{T}_{s}}:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}\]and a related fitness function as\[\Phi \triangleq {{T}_{s}}\circ f\circ c\]. In this definition it is understood that the objective function Italic textf is determined by the application, while the specification of the decoding function Italic textc[1] and the fitness scaling function Subscript textItalic textTs are design issues.
After initialization, the execution proceeds iteratively. Each iteration consists of an application of one or more GOs. The combined effect of the GOs applied in a particular generation $t\in N$ is a transformation of the current population Italic textP(t) into a new population Italic textP(t+1).
In the population transformation $\mu ,{\mu}'\ in {{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}$(the parent and offspring population sizes, respectively). A mapping $T:{{H}^{\mu }}\ to {{H}^{{{\mu }'}}}$ is called a population transformation (Italic textPT). If $T(P)={P}'$, then Italic textP is the parent population and Superscript textItalic textP/ the offspring population. If $\mu ={\mu }'$,then it is called the population size.
The Italic textPT resulting from a GO often depends on the outcome of a random experiment. This result is referred to as a random population transformation (Italic textRPT or random PT). To define Italic textRPT, let $\mu \in {{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}$and $\Omega $ be a set (the sample space). A random function $R:\Omega \to T({{H}{\mu }},\bigcup\limits_{{\mu }'\ in {{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}}^{{}}{{{H}^{{{\mu }'}}}})$ is called a Italic textRPT. The distribution of Italic textPTs resulting from the application of a GO depends on the operator parameters; in other words, a GO maps its parameters to a Italic textRPT.
Now that both the fitness function and Italic textRPT have been defined, let$\mu \in {{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}$, Italic textX be a set (the parameter space) and $\Omega $ a set. The mapping $\Zeta :X\to T\left( \Omega ,T\left[ {{H}^{\mu }},\bigcup\limits_{{\mu }'\in {{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}}^{{}}{{{H}^{{{\mu}'}}}} \right] \right)$ is a GO. The set of GOs is denoted as $GAOP\left( H,\mu ,X,\Omega \right)$.
There are three common GOs: recombination,mutation, and selection. These three operators are roughly analogous to their similarly named counterparts in genetics. The application of them in GAs is strictly Darwin-like in nature, i.e., “survival of the fittest.”
For the recombination operator let $r\in GAOP\left( H,\mu ,X,\Omega \right)$. If there exists $P\in {{H}^{\mu }},\Theta \in X$, and $\omega \in \Omega $, such that one individual in the offspring population ${{r}_{\Theta }}\left( P \right)$ depends on more than one individual of P,then r is referred to as a recombination operator.
For the mutation operator let $m\in GAOP\left( H,\mu ,X,\Omega\right)$. If for every $P\in {{H}^{\mu }}$, for every $\Theta \in X$, for every $\omega\in \Omega $, and if each individual in the offspring population ${{m}_{\Theta}}\left( P \right)$ depends on at most one individual of P, then m is called a mutation operator.
Finally, for the selection operator let $s\in EVOP\left( H,\mu ,X\times T\left(H,\mathbb{R}),\Omega \right) \right)$. If $P\in {{H}^{\mu }}$,$\Theta \in X$,$\Phi :H\to\mathbb{R}$in all cases, and satisfies $a\in {{s}_{\left( \Theta ,\Phi \right)}}(P)\Rightarrow a\in P$, then s is a selection operator.
Bold textEndnotes
[1] If the domain of c is total, i.e., the domain of c is all of A I, c is called a decoding function. The mapping of c is not necessarily surjective. The range of c determines the subset of Al available for exploration by the evolutionary algorithm.
Genetic Algorithms. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Genetic_Algorithms&oldid=27685