Difference between revisions of "Talk:Density of a set"
From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
(theorem 4: a doubt) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
— Really? But what happens if $\mu$ is an atom at a point? --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 19:21, 3 August 2012 (CEST) | — Really? But what happens if $\mu$ is an atom at a point? --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 19:21, 3 August 2012 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Indeed, the correct assumption is that the density must exist for $\mu$-a.e. $x$. Thanks for pointing it out. The same error appears in Theorem 5.[[User:Camillo.delellis|Camillo]] 08:24, 4 August 2012 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 06:24, 4 August 2012
"Theorem 4 Let $\mu$ be a locally finite Radon measure on $\mathbb R^n$. If the $n$-dimensional density $\theta^n (\mu, x)$ exists for $\lambda$-a.e. $x$, then the measure $\mu$ is given by the formula (1) where $f = \theta^n (\mu, \cdot)$."
— Really? But what happens if $\mu$ is an atom at a point? --Boris Tsirelson 19:21, 3 August 2012 (CEST)
- Indeed, the correct assumption is that the density must exist for $\mu$-a.e. $x$. Thanks for pointing it out. The same error appears in Theorem 5.Camillo 08:24, 4 August 2012 (CEST)
How to Cite This Entry:
Density of a set. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Density_of_a_set&oldid=27345
Density of a set. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Density_of_a_set&oldid=27345