Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hadamard theorem"
From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
(Created page with "In the section on determinants, shouldn't the $\mu$s and $\nu$s be subscripted?, i.e. $$a_{\mu_1}\overline{a}_{\nu_1}+\cdots +a_{\mu_n}\overline{a}_{\nu_n}=0$$") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In the section on determinants, shouldn't the $\mu$s and $\nu$s be subscripted?, i.e. | In the section on determinants, shouldn't the $\mu$s and $\nu$s be subscripted?, i.e. | ||
$$a_{\mu_1}\overline{a}_{\nu_1}+\cdots +a_{\mu_n}\overline{a}_{\nu_n}=0$$ | $$a_{\mu_1}\overline{a}_{\nu_1}+\cdots +a_{\mu_n}\overline{a}_{\nu_n}=0$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | : No; they are entries of a matrix, so for example $a_{\mu 1}$ denotes the element in the $\mu$-th row and 1st column. [[User:TBloom|TBloom]] 12:36, 22 April 2012 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 10:36, 22 April 2012
In the section on determinants, shouldn't the $\mu$s and $\nu$s be subscripted?, i.e. $$a_{\mu_1}\overline{a}_{\nu_1}+\cdots +a_{\mu_n}\overline{a}_{\nu_n}=0$$
- No; they are entries of a matrix, so for example $a_{\mu 1}$ denotes the element in the $\mu$-th row and 1st column. TBloom 12:36, 22 April 2012 (CEST)
How to Cite This Entry:
Hadamard theorem. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Hadamard_theorem&oldid=25029
Hadamard theorem. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Hadamard_theorem&oldid=25029