Difference between revisions of "Talk:Absolutely continuous measures"
From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
(Created page with "Should - $\nu_a$ be $-\nu_a$ here? (a hyphen in text mode is a hyphen, it is only a minus in math mode)") |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Should - $\nu_a$ be $-\nu_a$ here? (a hyphen in text mode is a hyphen, it is only a minus in math mode) | + | Should - $\nu_a$ be $-\nu_a$ here? (a hyphen in text mode is a hyphen, it is only a minus in math mode) --[[User:Jjg|Jjg]] 20:12, 30 July 2012 (CEST) |
| + | |||
| + | :But I do not understand, why at all the "- $\nu_a$" ? It seems, it was added by you; really? What does it mean? --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 18:27, 30 July 2012 (CEST) | ||
| + | :: not added by me --[[User:Jjg|Jjg]] 20:12, 30 July 2012 (CEST) | ||
| + | : Maybe the following is meant: | ||
| + | where | ||
| + | * $\nu_a$ is absolutey continuous with respect to $\mu$; | ||
| + | * $\nu_s$ is singular with respect to $\mu$ | ||
| + | : --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 18:34, 30 July 2012 (CEST) | ||
| + | :: Yes, I think this is stray punctuation (as in the endashes used in French "bullet points" but which has ended up inline), I was just looking at this in "TeX error mode" and not reading the maths, ... --[[User:Jjg|Jjg]] 20:12, 30 July 2012 (CEST) | ||
| + | ::: The math is always worth reading... at least by authors :-) --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 21:18, 30 July 2012 (CEST) | ||
| + | ::: Indeed, I meant to put bullet points, but itemize does not work... well now I know how to put them :-) [[User:Camillo.delellis|Camillo]] 15:35, 31 July 2012 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:35, 31 July 2012
Should - $\nu_a$ be $-\nu_a$ here? (a hyphen in text mode is a hyphen, it is only a minus in math mode) --Jjg 20:12, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
- But I do not understand, why at all the "- $\nu_a$" ? It seems, it was added by you; really? What does it mean? --Boris Tsirelson 18:27, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
- not added by me --Jjg 20:12, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
- Maybe the following is meant:
where
- $\nu_a$ is absolutey continuous with respect to $\mu$;
- $\nu_s$ is singular with respect to $\mu$
- --Boris Tsirelson 18:34, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
- Yes, I think this is stray punctuation (as in the endashes used in French "bullet points" but which has ended up inline), I was just looking at this in "TeX error mode" and not reading the maths, ... --Jjg 20:12, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
- The math is always worth reading... at least by authors :-) --Boris Tsirelson 21:18, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
- Indeed, I meant to put bullet points, but itemize does not work... well now I know how to put them :-) Camillo 15:35, 31 July 2012 (CEST)
- Yes, I think this is stray punctuation (as in the endashes used in French "bullet points" but which has ended up inline), I was just looking at this in "TeX error mode" and not reading the maths, ... --Jjg 20:12, 30 July 2012 (CEST)
How to Cite This Entry:
Absolutely continuous measures. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Absolutely_continuous_measures&oldid=27259
Absolutely continuous measures. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Absolutely_continuous_measures&oldid=27259