Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bernstein inequality"
From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
(Created page with "Post-TeX notes * I would invite corrections to the notation used for expectation and probability here (I am no probablist). * I am unsure about the equation following the sen...") |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Post-TeX notes | Post-TeX notes | ||
| − | * I would invite corrections to the notation used for expectation and probability here (I am no probablist). | + | * I would invite corrections to the notation used for expectation ($\mathbb{E}$) and probability ($\mathbb{P}$) here (I am no probablist). |
| + | |||
| + | : Yes, as for me (a probabilist), these notations are good now. --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 19:34, 24 July 2012 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
* I am unsure about the equation following the sentence "Some idea of the accuracy of (2) may be obtained by comparing it with the approximate value of the left-hand side of (2) which is obtained by the central limit theorem in the form", should the square-root in the denominator of the RHS include the $t$ or not? It is difficult to tell from the original images and I do not have access to the literature at present. | * I am unsure about the equation following the sentence "Some idea of the accuracy of (2) may be obtained by comparing it with the approximate value of the left-hand side of (2) which is obtained by the central limit theorem in the form", should the square-root in the denominator of the RHS include the $t$ or not? It is difficult to tell from the original images and I do not have access to the literature at present. | ||
--[[User:Jjg|Jjg]] 18:12, 24 July 2012 (CEST) | --[[User:Jjg|Jjg]] 18:12, 24 July 2012 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Yes, it was not clear. But I, being a probabilist, took ''t'' outside the root. :-) --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 19:34, 24 July 2012 (CEST) | ||
| + | :: Thanks for both of those Boris --[[User:Jjg|Jjg]] 19:37, 24 July 2012 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:37, 24 July 2012
Post-TeX notes
- I would invite corrections to the notation used for expectation ($\mathbb{E}$) and probability ($\mathbb{P}$) here (I am no probablist).
- Yes, as for me (a probabilist), these notations are good now. --Boris Tsirelson 19:34, 24 July 2012 (CEST)
- I am unsure about the equation following the sentence "Some idea of the accuracy of (2) may be obtained by comparing it with the approximate value of the left-hand side of (2) which is obtained by the central limit theorem in the form", should the square-root in the denominator of the RHS include the $t$ or not? It is difficult to tell from the original images and I do not have access to the literature at present.
--Jjg 18:12, 24 July 2012 (CEST)
- Yes, it was not clear. But I, being a probabilist, took t outside the root. :-) --Boris Tsirelson 19:34, 24 July 2012 (CEST)
- Thanks for both of those Boris --Jjg 19:37, 24 July 2012 (CEST)
How to Cite This Entry:
Bernstein inequality. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Bernstein_inequality&oldid=27198
Bernstein inequality. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Bernstein_inequality&oldid=27198