Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sporadic simple group"
(why wikipediafs failed here?) |
(wikipediafs remarks, table formatting suggestion) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Post $\TeX$ remarks | Post $\TeX$ remarks | ||
− | * I could not edit this page using my usual | + | * I could not edit this page using my usual method (wikipediafs) so I could not fix the refs, could someone do it for me? |
* It might be nice to have some extra columns here | * It might be nice to have some extra columns here | ||
** reference to the relevant paper | ** reference to the relevant paper | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
: This math is out of my competence, but anyway I wonder, why wikipediafs failed here? --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 21:34, 30 April 2012 (CEST) | : This math is out of my competence, but anyway I wonder, why wikipediafs failed here? --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 21:34, 30 April 2012 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: Not sure, it may be a problem at my end, but now I cannot edit any pages via wikipediafs (even ones that I was editing yesterday). Very strange. --[[User:Jjg|Jjg]] 23:29, 30 April 2012 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::: I don't know anything about wikipediafs, but its [http://en.wikipedia.or /wiki/WikipediaFS#Disadvantages wp page] says its version 0.3 does not work with current wp. I prefer working with browser extensions like "Edit with emacs" (chromium) and/or "It's all text" (firefox). --[[User:Ulf Rehmann|Ulf Rehmann]] 09:58, 1 May 2012 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::: The most recent version works fine, it has the disadvantage that it must login to make each each "commit", and does not give a lot of feedback when it fails (the above failure was due to the recent login problems), but at least it does work -- I spent a full evening trying to coerce "It's all text" to play nice, and I really don't want to change browser just to edit a page... --[[User:Jjg|Jjg]] 19:24, 2 May 2012 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | A lot of things could be added here. Each of the sporadic group names should have its own page. We only have the Mathieu groups as a distinguished page. --[[User:Ulf Rehmann|Ulf Rehmann]] 01:02, 1 May 2012 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I like to propose that the word "group" be dropped from the second column and put in the header instead; eg | ||
+ | $\newcommand{\d}{\cdot}$ | ||
+ | {| class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto;" | ||
+ | |+ The twenty-six sporadic simple groups | ||
+ | ! Notation | ||
+ | ! Name (group) | ||
+ | ! Order | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | $J_1$ | ||
+ | | Janko | ||
+ | | $2^3\d 3\d 5\d 7\d 11\d 19$ | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | This is normal typographic practice in tables for units, for example. It would have the advantage that it would free up some horizontal space for other columns, as suggested above. --[[User:Jjg|Jjg]] 19:24, 2 May 2012 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 17:24, 2 May 2012
Post $\TeX$ remarks
- I could not edit this page using my usual method (wikipediafs) so I could not fix the refs, could someone do it for me?
- It might be nice to have some extra columns here
- reference to the relevant paper
- date of discovery
- order in decimal
- possibly allow sorting by some of these columns?
I am seriously out of my depth on this topic, so I will leave it to others to consider whether these are worth doing ... -- Jjg 21:12, 30 April 2012 (CEST)
- This math is out of my competence, but anyway I wonder, why wikipediafs failed here? --Boris Tsirelson 21:34, 30 April 2012 (CEST)
- Not sure, it may be a problem at my end, but now I cannot edit any pages via wikipediafs (even ones that I was editing yesterday). Very strange. --Jjg 23:29, 30 April 2012 (CEST)
- I don't know anything about wikipediafs, but its /wiki/WikipediaFS#Disadvantages wp page says its version 0.3 does not work with current wp. I prefer working with browser extensions like "Edit with emacs" (chromium) and/or "It's all text" (firefox). --Ulf Rehmann 09:58, 1 May 2012 (CEST)
- The most recent version works fine, it has the disadvantage that it must login to make each each "commit", and does not give a lot of feedback when it fails (the above failure was due to the recent login problems), but at least it does work -- I spent a full evening trying to coerce "It's all text" to play nice, and I really don't want to change browser just to edit a page... --Jjg 19:24, 2 May 2012 (CEST)
A lot of things could be added here. Each of the sporadic group names should have its own page. We only have the Mathieu groups as a distinguished page. --Ulf Rehmann 01:02, 1 May 2012 (CEST)
I like to propose that the word "group" be dropped from the second column and put in the header instead; eg $\newcommand{\d}{\cdot}$
Notation | Name (group) | Order |
---|---|---|
$J_1$ | Janko | $2^3\d 3\d 5\d 7\d 11\d 19$ |
This is normal typographic practice in tables for units, for example. It would have the advantage that it would free up some horizontal space for other columns, as suggested above. --Jjg 19:24, 2 May 2012 (CEST)
Sporadic simple group. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Sporadic_simple_group&oldid=25786