Difference between revisions of "Talk:Double limit"
From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
(the real-valued case) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:(And please sign your messages with four tildas: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) :-) | :(And please sign your messages with four tildas: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) :-) | ||
:[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 22:36, 13 January 2014 (CET) | :[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 22:36, 13 January 2014 (CET) | ||
+ | :In fact I often saw similar things in other pages, where the definitions are a bit imprecise for my taste (i.e. some assumptions are not spelled out, although it is usually not that difficult to figure out what they are). You are very welcome to try to improve the page! [[User:Camillo.delellis|Camillo]] ([[User talk:Camillo.delellis|talk]]) 21:50, 14 January 2014 (CET) |
Latest revision as of 20:50, 14 January 2014
how about the space in which this double sequence exists? Does it have to be real? Or Banach?
- The article discusses the real-valued case, except for the last phrase: "while the values ... also belong to a topological space".
- (And please sign your messages with four tildas: ~~~~) :-)
- Boris Tsirelson (talk) 22:36, 13 January 2014 (CET)
- In fact I often saw similar things in other pages, where the definitions are a bit imprecise for my taste (i.e. some assumptions are not spelled out, although it is usually not that difficult to figure out what they are). You are very welcome to try to improve the page! Camillo (talk) 21:50, 14 January 2014 (CET)
How to Cite This Entry:
Double limit. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Double_limit&oldid=31242
Double limit. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Double_limit&oldid=31242