Difference between revisions of "Genetic Algorithms"
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
A generic GA (also know as an evolutionary algorithm [EA]) assumes a discrete search space H and a function | A generic GA (also know as an evolutionary algorithm [EA]) assumes a discrete search space H and a function | ||
− | + | \[f:H\to\mathbb{R}\], | |
where H is a subsetof the Euclidean space\[\mathbb{R}\]. | where H is a subsetof the Euclidean space\[\mathbb{R}\]. | ||
The general problem is to find | The general problem is to find | ||
− | + | \[\arg\underset{X\in H}{\mathop{\min }}\,f\] | |
where X is avector of the decision variables and f is the objective function. | where X is avector of the decision variables and f is the objective function. | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
With GAs it is customary to distinguish genotype–the encoded representation of the variables–from phenotype–the set of variablesthemselves. The vector X is represented by a string (or chromosome) s of length l madeup of symbols drawn from an alphabet A using the mapping | With GAs it is customary to distinguish genotype–the encoded representation of the variables–from phenotype–the set of variablesthemselves. The vector X is represented by a string (or chromosome) s of length l madeup of symbols drawn from an alphabet A using the mapping | ||
− | + | \[c:{{A}^{l}}\to H\] | |
The mapping c is not necessarily surjective. The range of c determine the subset of Al available for exploration by a GA. | The mapping c is not necessarily surjective. The range of c determine the subset of Al available for exploration by a GA. | ||
The range of c, Ξ | The range of c, Ξ | ||
− | + | \[\Xi\subseteq {{A}^{l}}\] | |
is needed to account for the fact that some strings in the image Al under c may represent invalid solutions to the original problem. | is needed to account for the fact that some strings in the image Al under c may represent invalid solutions to the original problem. | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Given the statements above, the optimization becomes: | Given the statements above, the optimization becomes: | ||
− | + | \[\arg\underset{S\in L}{\mathop{\min g}}\,\], | |
given the function | given the function | ||
− | + | \[g(s)=f(c(s))\]. | |
Finally, with GAs it is helpful if c is a bijection. The important property of bijections as they applyto GAs is that bijections have an inverse, i.e., there is a unique vector x for every string and a unique stringfor each x. | Finally, with GAs it is helpful if c is a bijection. The important property of bijections as they applyto GAs is that bijections have an inverse, i.e., there is a unique vector x for every string and a unique stringfor each x. | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
2. Genetic algorithms and their operators | 2. Genetic algorithms and their operators | ||
− | The following statements about the operators of GAs are | + | The following statements about the operators of GAs are adapted from Coello et al.(2002). |
· Let H be a nonempty set (the individual orsearch space) | · Let H be a nonempty set (the individual orsearch space) | ||
− | · \[{{\left\{{{u}^{i}} \right\}}_{i\in \mathbb{N}}}\] a sequence in\[{{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}\] (the parent populations) | + | · \[{{\left\{{{u}^{i}} \right\}}_{i\in \mathbb{N}}}\] a sequence in \[{{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}\] (the parent populations) |
− | · \[{{\left\{ {{u}^{'(i)}} \right\}}_{i\in\mathbb{N}}}\] a sequence in \[{{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}\](the offspring | + | · \[{{\left\{ {{u}^{'(i)}} \right\}}_{i\in\mathbb{N}}}\] a sequence in \[{{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}\](the offspring population sizes) |
− | · \[\phi :H\to \mathbb{R}\] a fitness function: \[\iota :\cup _{i=1}^{\infty}{{({{H}^{u}})}^{(i)}}\to \] {true, false} (the termination criteria) | + | · \[\phi :H\to \mathbb{R}\] a fitness function: \[\iota :\cup _{i=1}^{\infty}{{({{H}^{u}})}^{(i)}}\to \] {true, false} (the termination criteria) \[\chi\in \]{true, false} |
− | + | · r a sequence \[\left\{ {{r}^{(i)}} \right\}\] of recombination operators τ(i) :\[X_{r}^{(i)}\to T(\Omega _{r}^{(i)} | |
− | · m a sequence of {m(i)} | + | · m a sequence of {m(i)} of mutation operators in mi, \[X_{m}^{(i)}\ to T(\Omega _{m}^{(i)},T\left( {{H}^{{{u}^{(i)}}}},{{H}^{u{{'}^{(i)}}}} \right))\] |
− | + | · s a sequence of {si} selection operators s(i): \[X_{s}^{(i)}\timesT(H,\mathbb{R})\to T(\Omega _{s}^{(i)},T(({{H}^{u{{'}^{(i)+\chi {{\mu}^{(i)}}}}}}),{{H}^{{{\mu }^{(i+1)}}}}))\] | |
· \[\Theta _{r}^{(i)}\in X_{r}^{(i)}\] (the recombination parameters) | · \[\Theta _{r}^{(i)}\in X_{r}^{(i)}\] (the recombination parameters) | ||
− | · \[\Theta _{m}^{(i)}\in X_{m}^{(i)}\] ( | + | · \[\Theta _{m}^{(i)}\in X_{m}^{(i)}\] (the mutation parameters) |
· \[\Theta _{s}^{(i)}\in X_{s}^{(i)}\] (the selection parameters) | · \[\Theta _{s}^{(i)}\in X_{s}^{(i)}\] (the selection parameters) | ||
− | |||
− | + | Coello et al. define the collection μ (thenumber of individuals) via Hμ.The population transforms are denoted by | |
+ | |||
+ | \[T:{{H}^{\mu }}\to {{H}^{\mu }}\] | ||
where | where | ||
− | + | \[\mu \in \mathbb{N}\] | |
However, some GA methods generate populationswhose size is not equal to their predecessors’. In a more general framework | However, some GA methods generate populationswhose size is not equal to their predecessors’. In a more general framework | ||
− | + | \[T:{{H}^{\mu}}\to {{H}^{{{\mu }'}}}\] | |
can accommodate populations that contain the same ordifferent individuals. This mapping has the ability to represent all populationsizes, evolutionary operators, and parameters as sequences. | can accommodate populations that contain the same ordifferent individuals. This mapping has the ability to represent all populationsizes, evolutionary operators, and parameters as sequences. |
Revision as of 14:48, 14 August 2012
Bold textGenetic Algorithms
1. Genetic algorithms (GAs): basic form
A generic GA (also know as an evolutionary algorithm [EA]) assumes a discrete search space H and a function
\[f:H\to\mathbb{R}\],
where H is a subsetof the Euclidean space\[\mathbb{R}\]. The general problem is to find
\[\arg\underset{X\in H}{\mathop{\min }}\,f\]
where X is avector of the decision variables and f is the objective function.
With GAs it is customary to distinguish genotype–the encoded representation of the variables–from phenotype–the set of variablesthemselves. The vector X is represented by a string (or chromosome) s of length l madeup of symbols drawn from an alphabet A using the mapping
\[c:{{A}^{l}}\to H\]
The mapping c is not necessarily surjective. The range of c determine the subset of Al available for exploration by a GA. The range of c, Ξ
\[\Xi\subseteq {{A}^{l}}\]
is needed to account for the fact that some strings in the image Al under c may represent invalid solutions to the original problem.
The string length l depends on the dimensions of both H and A, with the elements of the string corresponding to genes and the valuesto alleles. This statement of genes and alleles is often referred to as genotype-phenotype mapping.
Given the statements above, the optimization becomes:
\[\arg\underset{S\in L}{\mathop{\min g}}\,\],
given the function
\[g(s)=f(c(s))\].
Finally, with GAs it is helpful if c is a bijection. The important property of bijections as they applyto GAs is that bijections have an inverse, i.e., there is a unique vector x for every string and a unique stringfor each x.
2. Genetic algorithms and their operators
The following statements about the operators of GAs are adapted from Coello et al.(2002).
· Let H be a nonempty set (the individual orsearch space) · \[{{\left\{{{u}^{i}} \right\}}_{i\in \mathbb{N}}}\] a sequence in \[{{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}\] (the parent populations) · \[{{\left\{ {{u}^{'(i)}} \right\}}_{i\in\mathbb{N}}}\] a sequence in \[{{\mathbb{Z}}^{+}}\](the offspring population sizes) · \[\phi :H\to \mathbb{R}\] a fitness function: \[\iota :\cup _{i=1}^{\infty}{{({{H}^{u}})}^{(i)}}\to \] {true, false} (the termination criteria) \[\chi\in \]{true, false} · r a sequence \[\left\{ {{r}^{(i)}} \right\}\] of recombination operators τ(i) :\[X_{r}^{(i)}\to T(\Omega _{r}^{(i)} · m a sequence of {m(i)} of mutation operators in mi, \[X_{m}^{(i)}\ to T(\Omega _{m}^{(i)},T\left( {{H}^{{{u}^{(i)}}}},{{H}^{u{{'}^{(i)}}}} \right))\] · s a sequence of {si} selection operators s(i): \[X_{s}^{(i)}\timesT(H,\mathbb{R})\to T(\Omega _{s}^{(i)},T(({{H}^{u{{'}^{(i)+\chi {{\mu}^{(i)}}}}}}),{{H}^{{{\mu }^{(i+1)}}}}))\] · \[\Theta _{r}^{(i)}\in X_{r}^{(i)}\] (the recombination parameters) · \[\Theta _{m}^{(i)}\in X_{m}^{(i)}\] (the mutation parameters) · \[\Theta _{s}^{(i)}\in X_{s}^{(i)}\] (the selection parameters)
Coello et al. define the collection μ (thenumber of individuals) via Hμ.The population transforms are denoted by
\[T:{{H}^{\mu }}\to {{H}^{\mu }}\]
where
\[\mu \in \mathbb{N}\]
However, some GA methods generate populationswhose size is not equal to their predecessors’. In a more general framework
\[T:{{H}^{\mu}}\to {{H}^{{{\mu }'}}}\]
can accommodate populations that contain the same ordifferent individuals. This mapping has the ability to represent all populationsizes, evolutionary operators, and parameters as sequences.
Genetic Algorithms. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Genetic_Algorithms&oldid=27540