Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gamma-function"
From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
(Post-TeX remarks) |
m |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Renamed the second integration contour from $C^*$ to $C'$ | * Renamed the second integration contour from $C^*$ to $C'$ | ||
* Used $\gamma$ for the Euler constant rather than $C$ (which also clashed with the notation for the first integration contour mentioned) | * Used $\gamma$ for the Euler constant rather than $C$ (which also clashed with the notation for the first integration contour mentioned) | ||
| − | * | + | * Redrew all figures |
--[[User:Jjg|Jjg]] 19:58, 27 April 2012 (CEST) | --[[User:Jjg|Jjg]] 19:58, 27 April 2012 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I have also used $\gamma$ for [[Euler constant]], since this is the modern convention. [[User:TBloom|TBloom]] 22:08, 27 April 2012 (CEST) | ||
| + | :: Good idea, I have never seen anything but $\gamma$ in this context. According to this [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Euler-MascheroniConstant.html article] on MathWorld, $C$ was used by Euler (1735), $\gamma$ by Mascheroni (1790). So a not-so-modern modern convention :-) --[[User:Jjg|Jjg]] 22:34, 27 April 2012 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:10, 29 April 2012
Post $\TeX$ remarks.
- Added links to Bohr–Mollerup
- Expanded the reference to Artin's monograph
- Renamed the second integration contour from $C^*$ to $C'$
- Used $\gamma$ for the Euler constant rather than $C$ (which also clashed with the notation for the first integration contour mentioned)
- Redrew all figures
--Jjg 19:58, 27 April 2012 (CEST)
- I have also used $\gamma$ for Euler constant, since this is the modern convention. TBloom 22:08, 27 April 2012 (CEST)
How to Cite This Entry:
Gamma-function. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Gamma-function&oldid=25610
Gamma-function. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Gamma-function&oldid=25610