View source for Continuity correction


{| class="wikitable"
!Copyright notice <!-- don't remove! --> 
|-
| This article ''Continuity Correction'' was adapted from an original article by Rabi Bhattacharya, which appeared in ''StatProb: The Encyclopedia Sponsored by Statistics and Probability Societies''. The original article ([<nowiki>http://statprob.com/encyclopedia/ContinuityCorrection.html</nowiki> StatProb Source], Local Files: [[Media:continuity_correction.pdf|pdf]] | [[Media:continuity_correction.tex|tex]]) is copyrighted by the author(s), the article has been donated to ''Encyclopedia of Mathematics'', and its further issues are under ''Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License'. All pages from StatProb are contained in the [[:Category:Statprob|Category StatProb]].
|-
|}

{{MSC|62G20}}

<!-- \documentclass[10pt]{article} 
     \usepackage{amssymb} 
     \usepackage{amsmath} 
     \usepackage{amsfonts} 
     \begin{document} -->

<center>
\mathbf{Continuity Correction}
</center>

<center>
Rabi Bhattacharya, The University of Arizona, USA
</center>
According to the central limit theorem (''CLT''), the distribution function $F_n$ of a normalized sum
$n^{-1/2}(X_1+...+X_n)$ of $n$ independent random variables $X_1,...,X_n$ , having a common distribution with mean zero and variance $\sigma^2>0$, converges to the distribution function $\Phi_{\sigma}$ of the normal distribution with mean zero and variance $\sigma^2$, as $n\rightarrow \infty$. We will write $\Phi$ for $\Phi_1$ for the case $\sigma=1$. The densities of $\Phi_{\sigma}$ and $\Phi$ are denoted by $\phi_{\sigma}$ and $\phi$, respectively. In the case $X_j's$ are discrete, $F_n$ has jumps and the normal approximation is not very good when $n$ is not sufficiently large. This is a problem which most commonly occurs in statistical tests and estimation involving the normal approximation to the binomial and, in its multi-dimensional version, in Pearson's frequency chisquare tests, or in tests for association in categorical data. Applying the ''CLT'' to a binomial random variable $T$ with distribution $B(n,p)$, with mean $np$ and variance $npq (q=1-p)$, the normal approximation is given , for integers $0\leq a \leq b\leq n$, by
\begin{align}
P(a \leq T \leq b) \approx \Phi((b-np)/\sqrt{npq}) - \Phi((a-np)/\sqrt{npq}).
\end{align}
Here $\approx$ indicates that the difference between its two sides goes to zero as $n\rightarrow \infty$. In particular, when $a=b$, the binomial probability $P(T=b) = C_b^np^bq^{n-b}$ is approximated by zero. This error is substantial if $n$ is not very large. One way to improve the approximation is to think graphically of each integer value $b$ of $T$ being uniformly spread over the interval $[b-\frac{1}{2} , b+\frac{1}{2}]$. This is the so called ''histogram approximation'', and leads to the ''continuity correction'' given by replacing $\{a\leq T\leq b\}$ by $\{a-\frac{1}{2}\leq T\leq b+\frac{1}{2}\}$
\begin{align}
P( a-\frac{1}{2} \leq T \leq b +\frac{1}{2}) \approx \Phi((b+\frac{1}{2} - np)/\sqrt{npq}) -\Phi((a-\frac{1}{2} - np)/\sqrt{npq}).
\end{align}
To give an idea of the improvement due to this correction, let $ n=20, p=.4$. Then $P( T\leq 7) =.4159$,
whereas the approximation (1) gives a probability $\Phi(-.4564) =.3240$, and the continuity correction (2) yields $\Phi(-.2282) =.4177$. Analogous continuity corrections apply to the Poisson distribution with a large mean.

For a precise mathematical justification of the continuity correction consider, in general, i.i.d. integer-valued random variables $X_1,...,X_n$, with lattice span 1, mean $\mu$, variance $\sigma^2$, and finite moments of order at least four. The distribution function $F_n(x)$ of $n^{-1/2}(X_1+...+X_n)$ may then be approximated by the ''Edgeworth expansion'' (See Bhattacharya and Ranga Rao (1976), p. 239, or Gnedenko and Kolmogorov (1954), p. 213)
\begin{align}
F_n(x) = \Phi_{\sigma}(x) -n^{-\frac{1}{2}}S_1(n\mu + n^{\frac{1}{2}}x) \phi_{\sigma}(x) + n^{-\frac{1}{2}}\mu_{3}/(6\sigma^3)(1-x^2/\sigma^2) \phi_{\sigma}(x) + O(n^{-1}),
\end{align}
where $S_1(y)$ is the right continuous periodic function $y-\frac{1}{2}$ (mod 1) which vanishes when $y= \frac{1}{2}$. Thus, when a is an integer and $x = (a-n\mu)/\sqrt{n}$, replacing a by $a+\frac{1}{2}$ (or $a-\frac{1}{2}$) on the right side of (3) gets rid of the discontinuous term involving $S_1$.

Consider next the continuity correction for the ''(Mann-Whitney-)Wilcoxon two sample test''. Here
one wants to test nonparametrically if one distribution G is stochastically larger than another distribution F, with distribution functions $G(.)$, $F(.)$. Then the null hypothesis is $H_0: F(x) = G(x)$ for all $x$, and the alternative is $H_1: G(x) \leq F(x)$ for all $x$, with strict inequality for some $x$. The test is based on independent random samples $X_1,...,X_m$ and $Y_1,...,Y_n$ from the two unknown continuous distributions $F$ and $G$, respectively. The test statistic is $W_s$ = the sum of the ranks of the $Y_j's$ in the combined sample of $m+n$ $X_i's$ and $Y_j's$. The test rejects $H_0$ if $W_s \geq c$, where $c$ is chosen such that the probability of rejection under $H_0$ is a given level $\alpha$. It is known (see Lehmann (1975), pp. 5-18) that $W_s$ is asymptotically normal and $E(W_s)= \frac{1}{2}n(m+n+1)$, $Var(W_s)= mn(m+n+1)/12$. Since $W_s$ is integer-valued, the continuity correction yields
$$
\label{eqn:rabi}
P(W_s \geq c| H_0) = P(W_s \geq c-\frac{1}{2}| H_0) \approx 1-\Phi(z),
\tag{1}$$

where $z = (c-\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}n(m+n+1))/\sqrt{ mn(m+n+1)/12}$.


As an example, let $m =5$, $n= 7$, $c=54$. Then $ P(W_s \geq 54\mid H_0) =.101$, and its normal approximation is $1-\Phi(1.380) =.0838$. The continuity correction yields the better approximation $P(W_s \geq 54\mid H_0) = P(W_s \geq 53.5\mid H_0) \approx 1- \Phi(1.299) =.0097$.

The continuity correction is also often used in $2\times 2$ ''contingency tables'' for testing for association between two categories. It is simplest to think of this as a two-sample problem for comparing two
proportions $p_1,p_2$ of individuals with a certain characteristic (e.g., smokers) in two populations (e.g., men and women), based on two independent random samples of sizes $n_1,n_2$ from the two populations, with $n = n_1+n_2$. Let $r_1,r_2$ be the numbers in the samples possessing the characteristic. Suppose first that we wish to test $H_0: p_1=p_2$, against $H_1: p_1<p_2$. Consider the test which rejects $H_0$, in favor of $H_1$, if $r_2 \geq c(r)$, where $r=r_1+r_2$, and $c(r)$ is chosen so that the conditional probability (under $H_0$) of $r_2 \geq c(r)$, given $r_1+r_2=r$, is $\alpha$. This is the uniformly most powerful unbiased (''UMPU'') test of its size (See Lehmann (1959), pp. 140-146, or Kendall and Stuart (1973), pp. 570-576). The conditional distribution of $r_2$ , given $r_1+r_2=r$, is multinomial, and the test using it is called ''Fisher's exact test''. On the other hand, if $n_ip_i \geq5$ and $n_i(1-p_i)\geq 5$ $(i=1,2)$, the normal approximation is generally used to reject $H_0$. Note that the (conditional) expectation and variance of $r_2$ are $n_2r/n$ and $n_1n_2r(n-r)/[n^2(n-1)]$, respectively (See Lehmann (1975), p. 216). The normalized statistic $t$ is then
\begin{align}
t = [r_2 - n_2r/n]/ \sqrt{ n_1n_2r(n-r)/[n^2(n-1)]},
\end{align}
and $H_0$ is rejected when $t$ exceeds $z_{1-\alpha}$, the $(1-\alpha)th$ quantile of $\Phi$. For the continuity correction, one subtracts $\frac{1}{2}$ from the numerator in (5), and rejects $H_0$ if this adjusted $t$ exceeds $z_{1-\alpha} $. Against the two-sided alternative $H_1: p_1 \neq p_2$, Fisher's ''UMPU'' test rejects $H_0$ if $r_2$ is either too large or too small. The corresponding continuity corrected $t$ rejects $H_0$ if either the adjusted $t$, obtained by subtracting $\frac{1}{2}$ from the numerator in (5), exceeds $ z_{1-\alpha/2}$ , or if the $t$ adjusted by adding $\frac{1}{2}$ to the numerator in (5) is smaller than$ - z_{1-\alpha/2}$. This may be compactly expressed as
\begin{align}
\text{Reject } H_0 \text{  if } V\equiv (n-1)[\mid r_1n_2 - r_2n_1\mid -\frac{1}{2}n]^2 / (n_1n_2r(n-r)) > \chi^2_{1-\alpha}(1),
\end{align}
where $\chi^2_{1-\alpha}(1)$ is the $(1-\alpha)$th quantile of the chisquare distribution with 1 degree of freedom. This two-sided continuity correction was originally proposed by F.Yates in1934, and it is known as ''Yates' correction''. For numerical improvements due to the continuity corrections above, we refer to Kendall and Stuart (1973), pp. 575-576, and Lehmann (1975), pp. 215-217. For a critique, see Connover (1974). If the sampling of $n$ units is done at random from a population with two categories (men and women), then the ''UMPU'' test is still the same as Fisher's test above, conditioned on fixed marginals $n_1$,(and, therefore, $n_2$) and $r$.

Finally, extensive numerical computations in Bhattacharya and Chan (1996) show that the chisquare approximation to the distribution of ''Pearson's frequency chisquare'' statistic is reasonably good for degrees of freedom 2 and 3, even in cases of small sample sizes, extreme asymmetry, and values of expected cell frequencies much smaller than 5. One theoretical justification for this may be found in the classic work of Esseen (1945), which shows that the error of chisquare approximation is $O(n^{-d/(d+1)} )$ for degrees of freedom d. 


\mathbf
====References====
{|
|-
|valign="top"|{{Ref|1}}||valign="top"|  Bhattacharya, R.N. and Chan, N.H. (1996). Comparisons of chisquare, Edgeworth expansions and bootstrap approximations to the distribution of the frequency chisquare. ''Sankhya, Ser.A'', '''58''',57-68. 
|-
|valign="top"|{{Ref|2}}||valign="top"|  Bhattacharya, R.N. and Ranga Rao, R.(1976). ''Normal Approximation and Asymptotic Expansions''. Wiley, New York.
|-
|valign="top"|{{Ref|3}}||valign="top"|  Connover, W.J.(1974). Some reasons for not using Yates' continuity correction on $2\times2$ contingency tables. ''J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.'' '''69''', 374-376.
|-
|valign="top"|{{Ref|4}}||valign="top"|  Esseen, C.G.(1945). Fourier analysis of distribution functions: A mathematical study of the Laplace-Gaussian law. ''Acta Math''. '''77''', 1-125.
|-
|valign="top"|{{Ref|5}}||valign="top"|  Genedenko, B.V. and Kolmogorov, A.N. (1954). ''Limit Distributions of Sums of Independent Random Variables''. English translation by K.L. Chung. Reading, Massachussetts.
|-
|valign="top"|{{Ref|6}}||valign="top"|  Kendall, M.G. and Stuart, A. (1973). ''The Advanced Theory of Statistics''. Vol. 2, 3rd edition. Griffin, London.
|-
|valign="top"|{{Ref|7}}||valign="top"|  Lehmann, E.L.(1959). ''Testing Statistical Hypotheses''. Wiley, New York.
|-
|valign="top"|{{Ref|8}}||valign="top"|  Lehmann, E.L. (1975). ''Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks.'' (With the special assistance of DA'brera, H.J.M.), Holden-Day, Oakland, California. \footnotetext[1]{Reprinted with permission from Lovric, Miodrag (2011), International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science. Heidelberg: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC}
|-
|}


<references />

[[Category:Statprob]]