View source for Talk:Negative hypergeometric distribution

The PDF formula refers to the parameter ''n'', which is undefined. This is probably a typo. --[[User:Erel Segal|Erel Segal]] ([[User talk:Erel Segal|talk]]) 15:15, 23 March 2015 (CET)
:Typo, indeed. It should be $N$, not $n$. Thank you. Would you like to fix it yourself? --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 18:08, 23 March 2015 (CET)
::The equation was an image I could not edit, so I replaced it with a latex equation - I hope I did this right. --[[User:Erel Segal|Erel Segal]] ([[User talk:Erel Segal|talk]]) 20:31, 24 March 2015 (CET)
:::Yes, this is one of our problems; you could look at [[Help:HowTo EoM]], or just see some new articles made in TeX.  Anyway, I did it a bit nicer. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 08:17, 25 March 2015 (CET)
::::Yes, this looks much nicer. While we are at it: I did not understand why this formula is correct. Can you please add an intuitive explanation? Also, I didn't understand the formula at the bottom, connecting the negative-hypergeometric with the hypergeometric. Can you explain this too? --[[User:Erel Segal|Erel Segal]] ([[User talk:Erel Segal|talk]]) 08:25, 25 March 2015 (CET)