View source for Lewy operator and Mizohata operator

In the mid 1950s, B. Malgrange and L. Ehrenpreis showed that one can solve all linear constant-coefficients partial differential equations on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l1200801.png" /> (cf. also [[Malgrange–Ehrenpreis theorem|Malgrange–Ehrenpreis theorem]]; [[Linear partial differential equation|Linear partial differential equation]]). The question of solvability for variable coefficients was posed (avoiding singular points, as needed even in the theory of ordinary differential equations). H. Lewy [[#References|[a5]]] found the following example, which at the time (1956) was astonishing. In <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l1200802.png" /> variables <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l1200803.png" />, let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l1200804.png" /> be the operator (called the Lewy operator):

<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l1200805.png" /></td> </tr></table>

The [[Cauchy–Kovalevskaya theorem|Cauchy–Kovalevskaya theorem]] applies to this operator. So, if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l1200806.png" /> is a real-analytic function (cf. [[Class of differentiability|Class of differentiability]]) defined (say) near <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l1200807.png" />, then the equation <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l1200808.png" /> can be solved near <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l1200809.png" />, with <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008010.png" /> real analytic. But, there exists a <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008011.png" />-function <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008012.png" /> such that the equation <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008013.png" /> cannot be solved in any neighbourhood of (say) <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008014.png" />, even with <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008015.png" /> a distribution (cf. also [[Generalized function|Generalized function]]).

Later, it was noticed that the same phenomenon occurs, near any point <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008016.png" />, for the even simpler (embarrassingly simple!) operator, in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008017.png" /> variables (called the Mizohata operator):

<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008018.png" /></td> </tr></table>

Both operator have clear connections with complex analysis (cf. [[Functions of a complex variable, theory of|Functions of a complex variable, theory of]]).

The Lewy operator is the tangential Cauchy–Riemann operator (cf. [[Bergman kernel function|Bergman kernel function]]) on the  "Heisenberg group" , the hypersurface in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008019.png" /> parametrized by <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008020.png" />. This simply means that the functions <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008021.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008022.png" /> are in the kernel of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008023.png" />. So, in other coordinates, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008024.png" /> is the Cauchy–Riemann vector field on the unit sphere in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008025.png" /> (the tangential operator characterizing holomorphic functions). An earlier paper by Lewy was [[#References|[a4]]]!

The Mizohata operator can be obtained (up to a factor) by pulling back the standard Cauchy–Riemann operator on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008026.png" /> via the singular change of variables: <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008027.png" />. Notice that indeed <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008028.png" />.

This connection with complex analysis allows simple, and transparent, proofs of the non-local solvability (in particular, via the obvious non-propagation of singularities for the adjoint operators).

If one decomposes <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008029.png" /> or <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008030.png" /> into real part and imaginary part <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008031.png" />, the commutator of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008032.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008033.png" /> does not belong to the linear span of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008034.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008035.png" /> (for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008036.png" /> in case of the Mizohata operator). L.V. Hörmander understood that this fact was crucial and he showed that, more generally, a similar condition on the commutator of the higher-order terms for general linear differential operators implies non-local solvability. See [[#References|[a3]]], Chap. 6.

However, real operators may also be  "without solutions" , since as pointed out by F. Treves in 1962, the operator <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008037.png" /> is a real operator (and so is <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008038.png" />).

The question of local solvability for vector fields is totally understood thanks to L. Nirenberg and Treves (condition P), [[#References|[a8]]], [[#References|[a11]]], Chap. VIII. In <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008039.png" />, the operator <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008040.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008041.png" />, is locally solvable at <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008042.png" /> if and only if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008043.png" /> is even. Again, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008044.png" /> (see [[#References|[a6]]], Appendix) is related to the Cauchy–Riemann operator via the mapping <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008045.png" /> which is one-to-one if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008046.png" /> is even. The kernel of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008047.png" /> consists of functions which are holomorphic functions of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008048.png" />, and this can be taken as the beginning of a whole theory, the theory of hypo-analytic structures initiated by M.S. Baouendi and Treves [[#References|[a1]]], [[#References|[a11]]].

The Lewy operator and the Mizohata operator are much more similar than it may look. Indeed, they are micro-locally equivalent ([[#References|[a2]]], Sect. 9, [[#References|[a10]]], Chap. IX), and in fact they serve as micro-local model for non-Levi degenerate CR-structures.

Perturbations of the Lewy operator and of the Mizohata operator are of interest. See [[#References|[a7]]], Chap. 1. One can construct arbitrary small perturbations of these operators, still as complex vector fields, in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008049.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008050.png" /> respectively, in such a way that the only functions annihilated by these operators will be those which are constant. This gives Nirenberg's example of a strictly pseudo-convex non-embeddable CR-structure (real dimension <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008051.png" />, CR dimension <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l120/l120080/l12008052.png" />).

However the Lewy and the Mizohata operators differ strikingly from the point of view of their small perturbations, for the uniqueness in the Cauchy problem (references, and an elementary exposition, can be found in [[#References|[a9]]]).

====References====
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M.S Baouendi,   F. Treves,   "A property of the functions and distributions annihilated by a locally integrable system of complex vector fields"  ''Ann. of Math.'' , '''113'''  (1981)  pp. 387–421</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top">  L. Boutet de Monvel,   "A course on pseudo differential operators and their applications" , Duke Univ.  (1976)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top">  L. Hörmander,   "Linear partial differential operators" , ''Grundl. Math. Wissenschaft.'' , '''116''' , Springer  (1966)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top">  H. Lewy,   "On the local character of the solutions of an atypical linear differential equation in three variables and a related problem for regular functions of two complex variables"  ''Ann. of Math.'' , '''64'''  (1956)  pp. 514–522</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top">  H. Lewy,   "An example of a smooth linear partial differential equation without solution"  ''Ann. of Math.'' , '''66'''  (1957)  pp. 155–158</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top">  S. Mizohata,   "Solutions nulles et solutions non analytiques"  ''J. Math. Kyoto Univ.'' , '''1'''  (1962)  pp. 271–302</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a7]</TD> <TD valign="top">  L. Nirenberg,   "Lectures on linear partial differential equations" , ''CBMS Reg. Conf.'' , '''17''' , Amer. Math. Soc.  (1973)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a8]</TD> <TD valign="top">  L. Nirenberg,   F. Treves,   "Solvability of a first-order linear partial differential equation"  ''Commun. Pure Appl. Math.'' , '''16'''  (1963)  pp. 331–351</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a9]</TD> <TD valign="top">  J.P. Rosay,   "CR functions vanishing on open sets. (Almost) complex structures and Cohen's example"  ''Indag. Math.'' , '''9'''  (1998)  pp. 289–303</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a10]</TD> <TD valign="top">  F. Treves,   "Introduction to pseudodifferential and Fourier integral operators" , Plenum  (1980)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a11]</TD> <TD valign="top">  F. Treves,   "Hypoanalytic structures, local theory" , Princeton Univ. Press  (1992)</TD></TR></table>