\documentclass[12pt]{article}

\begin{document}

\noindent{\bf  Richard von MISES}\\
b. 19 April 1883 - d. 14 July 1953
\vspace{.5 cm}


\noindent{\bf Summary.}
Von Mises was principally known for his work on the foundations of
probability and statistics (randomness) which was rehabilitated in the
1960s. He founded a school of applied mathematics in Berlin and wrote the
first text book on philosophical positivism in 1939.
\vspace{.5 cm}

As the Swedish probabilist Harald Cram\'er (q.v.) once put it sensitively, Richard von
Mises was one of those men who have both the ability and the energy
requisite for taking an active and creative interest in many widely
different fields. He has made outstanding contributions to subjects as
heterogeneous as literary criticism, positivistic philosophy, aerodynamics,
and stochastics [Cramer (1953), 657]. Richard von Mises was born in Lemberg
(now Lwiw, Ukraine) in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. He was the second of
three brothers; the eldest, Ludwig, became an economist of international
reputation. His father, Arthur von Mises, was a prominent railroad engineer
in the civil service. Both parents were Jewish; his mother Adele was a nee
Landau. Richard von Mises converted to Catholicism shortly before
World War I but
became an agnostic rather soon [Goldstein (1963), ix]. The family home was
in Vienna, were Richard went to school and studied mechanical engineering
at the Technical University until 1906. He became an assistant to the
professor of mechanics, Georg Hamel, in Bruenn (now Brno, Czech Republic),
were he obtained the venia legendi(Privatdozentur) in 1908. After only one
year (at the age of 26), von Mises was called to the University of
Strassburg as associate professor of applied mathematics, the field he made
famous [Geiringer (1968), 382]. During World War I, von Mises joined the
newly formed Flying Corps of the Austro-Hungarian Army (he had already a
pilot's licence). The lectures on the theory of flight which he gave to
German and Austrian officers constituted the first version of his Fluglehre
of 1918, which went through many editions. At the end of the war, von Mises
could not return to the now French Strasbourg. After short appointments in
Frankfurt and Dresden, he became director of the new Institute for Applied
Mathematics at the University of Berlin in 1920. Almost all papers by von
Mises on probability and statistics are from the second part of his career.
At the time of von Mises' two seminal papers "Fundamental Theorems of
Probability" and "The Foundations of Probability" in the {\it Mathematische
Zeitschrift} of 1919 [Von Mises, Selecta II] the conceptual foundations of
probability were still obscure. Von Mises' was unsatisfied with the
``classical" definition of probability by Laplace (q.v.),  based on the famous
``equally possible cases" and perpetuated by his former teacher in Vienna,
E. Czuber. There were, however, traditions within logics, psychology,
philosophy, and statistics (J. Venn (q.v.), G. Fechner (q.v.), G. Helm, 
H. Bruns) to equate
the probability of an event with the relative frequency of the event ``in
the long run". Richard von Mises, in his ``Foundations", drew on these
traditions, and borrowed the name ``Kollektiv" from psychologist Gustav
Theodor Fechner's ``Kollektivmasslehre" (1897). Von Mises' concept of a
collective, the definition of mathematical probability as the limit of a
frequency ratio, and the two fundamental postulates, requiring the
existence of the limiting values of the relevant frequencies, and their
invariance under any place selection independent from the outcomes of the
events, were soon to become familiar to all probabilists. In his
``Foundations" he urged that ``probability is a science of the same kind as
geometry and theoretical mechanics ... which aims to reproduce observable
phenomena not just as a reproduction of reality but rather as its
abstraction and idealisation" [Von Mises, Selecta II, 58]. Thus, Richard
von Mises ran into the fundamental philosophical and practical problems of
the application of mathematics to reality, which he tried to address on a
general level at about the same time in his programmatic paper on the ``aims
of applied mathematics" [Von Mises, Selecta II, 454 ff.] in the first
volume of the {\it Zeitschrift f\"ur Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik}
(ZAMM),
founded by him in 1921. In fact, one fundamental objection against von
Mises' axiomatics of probability was, that the very existence of a
collective could not be proven in a strict mathematical sense, since the
requirement of the irregularity (randomness) of  the collective precluded
mathematical rules for its construction. In his book {\it Probability,
Statistics, and Truth}, first published in German in 1928 and intended for
nonmathematical readers, von Mises replied to various criticisms, and gave
his comments on alternative systems proposed by others. Von Mises' position
towards the foundations of probability was intimately connected to his
philosophical positivism. Von Mises did not believe that statistical
explanations in physics - and other domains of knowledge - are of transient
utility while deterministic theories are the definite goal. Philosophers,
von Mises thought, are apt to ``eternalize" the current state of scientific
affairs, just as Kant held Euclidean space as an absolute category. In
contrast with these ``school philosophers," he called himself a ``positivist"
[Geiringer (1968), 384]. In 1939 von Mises published an influential
monograph on Positivism. 
Later editions of {\it Probability, Statistics, and
Truth} have a chapter with the expressive title ``A part of the theory of
sets? No!", which is explicitely directed against A.N.Kolmogorov's
measure-theoretic approach to probability. In a sense, the conflict between
von Mises and his enthusiastic and critical followers (J. Neyman (q.v.), 
A. Wald) and Kolmogorov was a difference in perspective, and one of the principle
merits of von Mises' approach was the historical influence on sharpening
the opposing standpoints. Mises pointed to the practical problems of
finding the appropriate ``collective" for a given statistical situation,
warned against misinterpretations of statistical data and stressed the
importance of Bayes' theorem (while strictly sticking to an ``objective"
interpretation of probability) as opposed to ``fiducial probability",
``maximum likelihood" and similar concepts in statistics. However, von
Mises' insistence on the ``collectives", especially on the infinity of
events, prevented him from acknowledging the relative merits of approaches
such as ``small sample theory". More in the tradition of his first paper of
1919, the ``Fundamentalsaetze", which deals mainly with the central limit
theorem, are Richard von Mises' various single contributions to the theory
and application of mathematical statistics. For the most part his results
are collected in his book of 1931, which was, however, supplemented by
later work on what he called ``statistical functions" and on a differential
calculus of asymptotic distributions. Among his earlier publications were
the (S.N.) Bernstein-von -Mises theorem on (Bayesian) statistical inference
and the Cram\'er
- von-Mises-test in non-parametrical statistics, as well as
important work on the statistical estimation of moments and expectation
[Witting (1990), pp. 792-93]. As to the foundations of probability there is no
doubt that Kolmogorov's approach had mathematical advantages in developing
the theories of stochastic processes, martingales, even risk theory. But it
was in a strange twist of events that von Mises foundation of probability
proved fruitful again in the 1960s. It was Kolmogrov himself who wrote in a
seminal paper on the algorithmic approach to information theory in 1963: ``I
have already expressed the view ... that the basis for the applicability of
the results of the mathematical theory of probability to real `random
phenomena' must depend on some form of the frequency concept of
probability, the unavoidable nature of which has been established by von
Mises in a spirited manner" [Uspensky (1989), p. 57]. Kolmogorov ``was
interested in the precise nature of the transition from chaotic sequences,
which have no apparent regularities, to random sequences, which exhibit
statistical regularities and and form the domain of probability theory
proper" [Lambalgen (1987), p. 734]. Kolmogorov's concept of chaoticness was
further developed by L. Levin and C.-P. Schnorr. The papers by Kolmogorov and
others showed, firstly, that statistical regularities in von Mises' sense
are not `simple', that is, they do not lead to a significant decrease in
complexity. Secondly, Mises' approach gives an opportunity to use
substantially the notion of an algorithm. That opportunity was taken by
A. Church and Kolmogorov. Thus, the notion of complexity within information
theory, due to A.N. Kolmogorov in the early 1960s, with its attendant
complexity-based definition of randomness, is the most important
development issuing from von Mises' attempt to define Kollektivs.
 
Given von Mises' biography as a former professor in Strassburg and as a
 pilot in the war it is understandable that he harboured strong political
 feelings against the treaty of Versailles (1919) and the treatment of
 Germans and Austrians after World War I. He became skeptical of
 international scientific communication altogether and opposed
 aerodynamicist Theodor von Karman's efforts to organize an international
 congress for applied mechanics in 1922 with the following words:
``You will not be surprised by the fact that I will not come, since my views
about Tyrol and the Italians are well known to you... Furthermore I am a
bit surprised at seeing that German professors feel the need to communicate
abroad their theoretical researches on flight, while we are at the same
time prevented from building real airplanes" [Battimelli (1988), 10]. 
On the other hand, philosophically, he did not belong to the mainstream of
German academe, even not to the scientific part of it. His contacts to the
Wiener Kreis and its Berlin branch Gesellschaft f\"ur Empirische Philosophie
in the late 1920s as well as his insistence on the values of applied
mathematics as opposed to the governing purism in mathematics set him at
variance with more conservative and more nationalist colleagues in Berlin
(L. Bieberbach, E. Schmidt). At the University of Berlin he had to fight for
the teaching permit to be awarded to his assistant and later wife Hilda
Geiringer [cf. Siegmund-Schultze (1993)]. Von Mises' colleagues never
proposed his election as a member of the leading Prussian Academy of
Sciences in Berlin, pointing to ``blunders" in his work as in the axiomatics
of probability, work which, as indicated above, proved far-sighted much
later. When von Mises had to leave Germany as a Jew in 1933, his feeling of
responsibility for the future of applied mathematics in Germany bordered on
self-denial. He proposed the Nazi Theodor Vahlen as his successor as
director of the Institute for Applied Mathematics and supported young
``Aryan" mathematicians to fill the vacated positions [Mises Papers
Harvard]. Von Mises left for Istanbul (Turkey) where he built another
Institute for Applied Mathematics, before he felt the need to flee, once
again, in 1939. Von Mises went to the United States where he became Gordon
McKay Professor of Aerodynamics and Applied Mathematics at Harvard
University in 1944. There he founded, together with von Karman, the
{\it Advances in Applied Mechanics} (since 1948).  His career in the United
States was successful, if not without the usual struggles for the
recognition of applied mathematics. One of his colleagues called it a
scandal that von Mises was not elected to the National Academy of Sciences
[Ludford (1983), 282]. When von Mises was finally proposed in 1950 as a
member of the former Prussian Academy, which had become meanwhile the
leading Academy in East Germany, he declined with the following words: 
``In the present circumstances ... the election could be interpreted and has
been interpreted as having definite political implications. I made it a
principle throughout my life to abstain from any kind of political activity
and never to join any association or group concerned with matters of a
political nature. Consequently, I feel compelled to desist from accepting
the membership generously offered to me." [Mises Papers Harvard] 
That von Mises would indeed always abstain from active and organized political
engagement, has to be understood in the context of his individualistic,
elitist world view. The latter was intimately connected with the
peculiarities of his biography as a repeatedly uprooted and wandering,
socially well-to-do intellectual from the lower Austrian nobility. His
world-view was reflected in von Mises' admiration of his countryman, the
elitist and world-weary poet Rainer Maria Rilke, of whom he became a noted
specialist (Von Mises' Rilke collection is now in the possession of
Houghton Library in Cambridge, Massachusetts). Thus, von Mises was
considered ``truly aristocratic, seeming proud and haughty to many"
[Goldstein (1963), xiii]. However, his conduct in many difficult
situations, not least when he sent CARE-parcels to colleagues in Europe
after World War II, showed what compassionate and loyal a human being he
actually was.
\vspace{.5 cm}

\begin{thebibliography}{3}
\bibitem{1} 
Battimelli, G. (1988). The Early International Congresses of Applied
Mathematics. In S. Juhasz (ed.), {\it IUTAM: A Short History}, Berlin etc.,
Springer.

\bibitem{2}  
Bernhardt, H. (1993). Skizzen zu Leben und
Werk von Richard Mises. In {\it {\OE}sterreichische Mathematik und Physik}, Wien:
Zentralbibliothek f\"{u}r Physik, 51-62.

\bibitem{3}  
Cram\'{e}r, H. (1953). Richard von Mises'
Work in Probability and Statistics. {\it Annals of Mathematical Statistics},
{\bf 24}, 657-662.

\bibitem{4}  
Fischer, G., F.Hirzebruch, W.Scharlau and W.Toernig (Eds., 1990.)
{\it Ein Jahrhundert Mathematik 1890-1990. Festschrift zum Jubilaeum der DMV}.
Braunschweig: Vieweg.

\bibitem{5}  
Geiringer, H. (1968). Von Mises, Richard.
{\it International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences}, New York: MacMillan,
382-385.

\bibitem{6}  
Goldstein, S. (1963). Richard von Mises 1883-1953. In Von Mises,
Selecta I, ix-xiv.

\bibitem{7}  
Lambalgen, M. van (1987). Von Mises' Definition of
Random Sequences Reconsidered. {\it The Journal of Symbolic Logic},
{\bf 52}, 725-755.

\bibitem{8} 
Ludford, G.S.S. (1983). Mechanics in the Applied-Mathematical World of von
Mises. {\it Zeitschrift f\"ur Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik (ZAMM)}, {\bf 63},  
281-282.

\bibitem{9}  
Mises, R. von (1931). {\it Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung und ihre
Anwendungen in der Statistik und der theoretischen Physik}. Leipzig und Wien
1931.

\bibitem{10}  
Mises, R. von (1951). {\it Positivism, a Study in Human Understanding}.
Cambridge (USA), (essentially a translation of the German original from
1939 (The Hague)).

\bibitem{11}  
Mises, R. von (1963/64). Selected Papers of Richard von
Mises, 2 volumes, Rhode Island: AMS (= Selecta I and II).

\bibitem{12}  
Mises, R. von,
Papers and Correspondence (Harvard University Archives, unpublished) =
[Mises  Papers Harvard].

\bibitem{13}  
Siegmund-Schultze, R. (1993). Hilda Geiringer-von
Mises, Charlier Series, Ideology, and the Human Side of the Emancipation of
Applied Mathematics at the University of Berlin during the 1920s.
{\it Historia Mathematica}, {\bf 20}, 364-381.

\bibitem{14}  
Uspensky, V.A. (1989). Kolmogorov and
Mathematical Logic. {\it Sitzungsberichte der Berliner Mathematischen
Gesellschaft 1988-1992}, 53-74.

\bibitem{15}  
Witting, H. (1990). Mathematische Statistik.
In Fischer et al. (eds. 1990), 781-815.
\vspace{1 cm}

\hfill{R. Siegmund-Schultze}



\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}

