\documentclass[12pt]{article}

\begin{document}

\noindent{\bf Sir Frederick Morton EDEN}\\
b. 18 June 1766 - d. 14 November 1809
\vspace{.5cm}

\noindent
{\bf Summary.} At the end of the eighteenth century, Eden's concern with
poverty, and with policies and insurance against it, was expressed in
pioneeringly extensive analyses and synthesis of carefully assembled data.
\vspace{.5 cm}

The published works of Sir Frederick Morton Eden on the pressing social issues
of his day are arguably without precedent in their combination of scope,
volume, and quality.

In 1797 came {\it The State of the Poor} - a massive history of the Poor Laws,
capped by over 900 pages of colourful and sorrowfull documentation of
widespread poverty, based on Eden's own statistical survey of 181 parishes in
England and Wales. The next year, he brought out a slim yet innovative
pamphlet, {\it Portobello: or a Plan for the Improvement of the Port and City
of London}, in which he made good use of frequency distributions of ship
tonnages.

In 1800 the curious public was given {\it An Estimate of the Number of
Inhabitants in Great Britain and Ireland}, well in advance of the publication
of the first population census. In 1801 Eden returned to his concern with
poverty, in his {\it Observations on Friendly Societies}, and again, in 1806,
with his second major work, the ``charter pamphlet" {\it On the Policy and
Expediency of Granting Insurance Charters}. In these two publications, Eden 
promoted the provision of insurance by Friendly Societies, backed by the
resources of joint-stock companies, as superior to any State-administered
schemes for helping the ``labouring classes" to surmount the natural
calamities of life. Only one of the titles of Eden's publications reveals
the empirical statistical character of his work, a feature which Eden has in
common with Florence Nightingale (q.v.), the ``Passionate Statistician".
The striking difference between the two lies in what is known about the
influences that moved them to achieve what they did.

Nightingale was manifestly fired with analytical zeal from adolescence,
and she built up a huge reservoir of motivation from her experiences in
the Crimean War. By contrast, biographical details about Eden are so
lacking that, until more is revealed and written about the man, it would
be futile to try to locate the firing of his investigative genius, which
shone brightly even against a family background of public service. Was
his thoughtful, analytical bent moulded by his life in America between the 
ages of three and perhaps six, as the eldest son of the last British
Governor of Maryland? - by the return with his mother alone to be
educated in England? - by the sudden early death of his father? Was it
triggered into action by knowledge that children were being sent to
work down the early coalmines of County Durham, where the family had
their ``seat"? - or more reflectively, by wide reading about the Poor?

What is known for sure is that when, in 1795, he initiated his survey for
{\it The State of the Poor}, he had a library with almost 300 books and
pamphlets dealing with problems of the Poor and the ironically rich
philosophy associated with them, but no more than 40 items under the heads 
of Cooking, Games and Sports, interests traditionally associated with
the landed gentry. In the preface to {\it The State of the Poor}, Eden
identified, with a liberal supply of commas, the immediate stimulus to
his inquiry;

\begin{quote}
``The difficulties, which the labouring classes experienced, from the high
price of grain, and of provisions in general, as well as of cloathing 
(sic!) and
fuel, during the years 1794 and 1795, induced me, from motives both of
benevolence and personal curiosity, to investigate their conditions in
various parts of the kingdom."
\end{quote}

The statistical findings reported in {\it The State of the Poor}, about
population. housing, rent, taxes, prices, wages, food consumption, and much 
more,
have been of considerable value to later economists. Even Karl Marx, not
wont to praise others, hailed Eden as the only disciple of Adam Smith
throughout the eighteenth century to produce work of any importance.

Eden set out his statistical stall quite openly: he criticixed ``writers
on the Poor" for ``making bricks without straw" and raising ``specious
systems without well authenticated facts to support them". But Eden
would not have been in the party of those founders of the Statistical
Section of the British Association (the Royal Statistical Society in
embryo) who wanted ``to exclude all Opinions" and ``confine...attention
rigorously to facts...which can be stated numerically and arranged in tables".
For Eden, as for Nightingale, figures had to be collected so that the
calculations based on them would answer some perssing question and advance
some desired reform - all of which needs ``opinions".

Eden had doubts about the 21 questions in his survey...``I will not assert
that my Queries are the best calculated to acquire the information I
wanted". He quoted with approval Rousseau's discouraging maxim that
one needs to know a lot before knowing how to find out what one does
not know.

Eden was even a rational sceptic about his own efforts to estimate
population, for which the issue was the current fear,during the war
with France, of a declining population:...``He who looks for more than
probabilities will be disappointed." His statistical method for
England and Wales was a sophisticated early example of ratio estimation;
its details can easily be misrepresented. Eden's estimate of 16 millions for
the British Isles came to within 1\% of the 1801 census, but only by a
fortuitous cancellation of an error od more than 1 1/2 millions in
the ratio estimate with an error in his guesswork for Scotland and
Ireland!

Perhaps Eden's boldest ``casting" stemmed from his role as founder
and chairman of the Globe Insurance Company. In 1803 he asked himself
``What is the total insurable value of property in the whole of the
United Kingdom, and how much of it is actually insured?" The
calculation is set out over 20 pages of the charter pamphlet. It
involved listing 23 property categories, estimating their insurance
values, making the usual guess for Ireland, adding the lot, and estimating
the total actually insured from records of stamp duty.

Eden may have erred in occasional detail, but he never lacked vision or
appeared to doubt that statistical analyses could add grace and light
to political debate on issues of social reform. This was not the view
of Disreali, born in the same year as Eden. Statisticians nowadays might 
wish that Eden had lived long enough to roast Disraeli's chesnut - before it had
taken root - about lies, damned lies, and worse. Eden would have been well
qualified to do so. But he died, on the 14th of November 1809 at the Chairman's
desk of the Globe Insurance Company.
\vspace{.5 cm}

\noindent{\bf Bibliography}

\noindent Deming, W.E. (1969). Sample surveys. In {\it International
Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences}, Vol. 13, edited by David L. Sills,
McMillan Co. \&amp; The Free Press. (Page 595 manages both to underestimate
and overestimate Eden's skills in statistical analysis.)

\noindent Eden, The Lord (1999). The Eden family. ISI Voorburg Conference
Proceedings, IOS Press, pp. 11-15.

\noindent Kenessey, Z.E. (1999). Sir Frederick Morton Eden's {\it The
State of the Poor} (1797-1997). ISI Voorburg Conference Proceedings,
IOS Press, pp. 3-10.

\noindent Stone, M. (1999). Policies for poverty from an analytical
aristocrat. ISI Voorburg Conference Proceedings, IOS Press, pp. 85-105.

\noindent Stone, Sir Richard (1998). {\it Some British Empiricists in
the Social Sciences 1650-1900}. Cambridge University Press.
\vspace{1 cm}

\hfill{Mervyn Stone}


\end{document}

