Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Toda lattices"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
(Importing text file)
 
m (AUTOMATIC EDIT (latexlist): Replaced 77 formulas out of 81 by TEX code with an average confidence of 2.0 and a minimal confidence of 2.0.)
Line 1: Line 1:
There are many Toda systems spawned by Toda's nearest neighbour linking of anharmonic oscillators on the line [[#References|[a1]]]. A convenient container is the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t1201302.png" />-Toda system, first introduced and studied comprehensively in [[#References|[a2]]]; see also [[#References|[a3]]].
+
<!--This article has been texified automatically. Since there was no Nroff source code for this article,
 +
the semi-automatic procedure described at https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/User:Maximilian_Janisch/latexlist
 +
was used.
 +
If the TeX and formula formatting is correct, please remove this message and the {{TEX|semi-auto}} category.
  
Let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t1201303.png" /> be a bi-infinite or semi-infinite matrix flowing as follows (<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t1201304.png" />, the shift operator):
+
Out of 81 formulas, 77 were replaced by TEX code.-->
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t1201305.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
{{TEX|semi-auto}}{{TEX|partial}}
 +
There are many Toda systems spawned by Toda's nearest neighbour linking of anharmonic oscillators on the line [[#References|[a1]]]. A convenient container is the $2$-Toda system, first introduced and studied comprehensively in [[#References|[a2]]]; see also [[#References|[a3]]].
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t1201306.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
Let $M$ be a bi-infinite or semi-infinite matrix flowing as follows ($\Lambda = \Lambda _ { i , j } = \delta _ { i + 1 , j }$, the shift operator):
  
<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t1201307.png" />, with Borel decomposition
+
\begin{equation*} \frac { \partial M } { \partial x _ { n } } = \Lambda ^ { n } M , \end{equation*}
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t1201308.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} \frac { \partial M } { \partial y _ { n } } = - M ( \Lambda ^ { t } ) ^ { n }, \end{equation*}
  
where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t1201309.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013010.png" /> are lower triagonal and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013011.png" />.
+
$n = 1,2 , \dots$, with Borel decomposition
 +
 
 +
\begin{equation*} M = S _ { 1 } ^ { - 1 } S _ { 2 }, \end{equation*}
 +
 
 +
where $S _ { 1 }$ and $S _ { 2 } ^ { t }$ are lower triagonal and $\operatorname {diag} ( S _ { 1 } ) = I$.
  
 
Define
 
Define
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013012.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} ( L _ { 1 } , L _ { 2 } ) = ( S _ { 1 } \Lambda S _ { 1 } ^ { - 1 } , S _ { 2 } \Lambda ^ { t } S _ { 2 } ^ { - 1 } ); \end{equation*}
  
 
then
 
then
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013013.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} \frac { \partial L _ { i } } { \partial x _ { n } } = [ ( L _ { 1 } ^ { n } ) _ { + } , L _ { i } ], \end{equation*}
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013014.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} \frac { \partial L _ { i } } { \partial y _ { n } } = [ ( L _ { 2 } ^ { n } ) _ { - } , L _ { i } ], \end{equation*}
  
<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013015.png" />; <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013016.png" />, with eigenvectors (<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013017.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013018.png" />):
+
$i = 1,2$; $n = 1,2 , \dots$, with eigenvectors ($[ \alpha ] = ( \alpha , \alpha ^ { 2 } / 2 , \alpha ^ { 2 } / 3 , \ldots )$, $\chi ( z ) = ( z ^ { n } ) _ { n \in \mathbf{Z} }$):
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013019.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} \Psi _ { 1 } ( z ) = e ^ { \sum _ { 1 } ^ { \infty } x _ { i } z ^ { i } } S _ { 1 } \chi ( z ) = \end{equation*}
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013020.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} = \left( \frac { e ^ { \sum _ { 1 } ^ { \infty } x _ { i } ^ { i } z ^ { i } } \tau _ { n } ( x - [ z ^ { - 1 } ] , y ) z ^ { n } } { \tau _ { n } ( x , y ) } \right) _ { n \in \mathbf{Z} } , \Psi _ { 2 } ( z ) = e ^ { \sum _ { 1 } ^ { \infty } y _ { i } z ^ { - i } } S _ { 2 } \chi ( z ) = \end{equation*}
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013021.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} = \left( \frac { e ^ { \sum _ { 1 }^{\infty} y _ { i } z ^ { - i } } \tau _ { n + 1 } ( x , y - [ z ] ) z ^ { n } } { \tau _ { n } ( x , y ) } \right) _ { n \in \mathbf{Z} } , ( L _ { 1 } , L _ { 2 } ) ( \Psi _ { 1 } ( z ) , \Psi _ { 2 } ( z ) ) = ( z , z ^ { - 1 } ) ( \Psi _ { 1 } ( z ) , \Psi _ { 2 } ( z ) ), \end{equation*}
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013022.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} \frac { \partial \Psi _ { i } } { \partial x _ { n } } = ( L ^ { n _ { 1 } } ) _ { + } \Psi _ { i } , \frac { \partial \Psi _ { i } } { \partial y _ { n } } = ( L _ { 2 } ^ { n } ) _ { - } \Psi _ { i }, \end{equation*}
  
<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013023.png" />; <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013024.png" />.
+
$i = 1,2$; $n = 1,2 , \dots$.
  
 
Let
 
Let
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013025.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} W _ { 1 } = S _ { 1 } e ^ { \sum _ { 1 } ^ { \infty } x _ { k } \Lambda ^ { k } }, \end{equation*}
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013026.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} W _ { 2 } = S _ { 2 } e ^ { \sum _ { 1 } ^ { \infty } y _ { k } ( \Lambda ^ { t } ) ^ { k } }; \end{equation*}
  
 
the crucial identity
 
the crucial identity
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013027.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} W _ { 1 } ( x , y ) W _ { 1 } ( x ^ { \prime } , y ^ { \prime } ) ^ { - 1 } = W _ { 2 } ( x , y ) W _ { 2 } ( x ^ { \prime } , y ^ { \prime } ) ^ { - 1 } \end{equation*}
  
 
is equivalent to the bilinear identities for the tau-functions
 
is equivalent to the bilinear identities for the tau-functions
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013028.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} \oint _ { z = \infty } \tau _ { n } ( x - [ z ^ { - 1 } ] , y ) \tau _ { m + 1 } ( x ^ { \prime } + [ z ^ { - 1 } ] , y ^ { \prime } ) \times \end{equation*}
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013029.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td style="width:94%;text-align:center;" valign="top"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013029.png"/></td> </tr></table>
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013030.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} = \oint _ { z = \infty } \tau _ { n + 1 } ( x , y - [ z ] ) \tau _ { m } ( x ^ { \prime } , y ^ { \prime } + [ z ] ) \times \end{equation*}
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013031.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} \times e ^ { \sum ( y _ { i } - y _ { i } ^ { \prime } ) z ^ { - i } } z ^ { n - m - 1 } d z, \end{equation*}
  
 
which characterize the solution.
 
which characterize the solution.
  
The <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013033.png" />-Toda system (which can always be imbedded in the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013034.png" />-Toda system) is just the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013035.png" />-flow for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013036.png" />, i.e. it just involves ignoring <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013037.png" /> and in effect freezing <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013038.png" /> at one value. This is equivalent to the Grassmannian flag <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013039.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013040.png" />, where
+
The $1$-Toda system (which can always be imbedded in the $2$-Toda system) is just the $x$-flow for $L_1$, i.e. it just involves ignoring $L_{2}$ and in effect freezing $y$ at one value. This is equivalent to the Grassmannian flag $W _ { n } \supset W _ { n  + 1}$, $n \in \mathbf{Z}$, where
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013041.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} W _ { n } = \operatorname { span } _ { \text{C} } \left\{ \frac { \partial ^ { k } \Psi _ { 1 , n } ( x , z ) } { \partial x _ { 1 } } : k = 0,1 , \ldots \right\}, \end{equation*}
  
or, alternatively, it is characterized by the left-hand side of the bilinear identities <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013042.png" /> for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013043.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013044.png" /> frozen (or suppressed). The semi-infinite (<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013045.png" /> or <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013046.png" />) Toda system involves setting <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013047.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013048.png" />, and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013049.png" />, in which case <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013050.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013051.png" /> are polynomials in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013052.png" /> of degree at most <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013053.png" />.
+
or, alternatively, it is characterized by the left-hand side of the bilinear identities $= 0$ for $n &gt; m$ and $\mathsf{y} = \mathsf{y} ^ { \prime }$ frozen (or suppressed). The semi-infinite ($1$ or $2$) Toda system involves setting $\tau _ { - i } = 0$, $i = 1,2 , \dots$, and $\tau _ { 0 } = 1$, in which case $\tau _ { n } ( x - [ z ] , y )$ and $\tau _ { n } ( x , y + [ z ] )$ are polynomials in $z$ of degree at most $n$.
  
The famous triagonal Toda system — the original Toda system — is equivalent to the reduction <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013054.png" /> or, equivalently, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013055.png" /> or, equivalently, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013056.png" />. In general, the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013058.png" />-gonal Toda system <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013059.png" /> is equivalent to <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013060.png" /> or, equivalently,
+
The famous triagonal Toda system — the original Toda system — is equivalent to the reduction $L _ { 1 } = L _ { 2 } = : L = L ( x - y )$ or, equivalently, $\Lambda M = M \Lambda ^ { t }$ or, equivalently, $\tau ( x , y ) = \tau ( x - y )$. In general, the $( 2 p + 1 )$-gonal Toda system $L _ { 1 } ^ { p } = L _ { 2 } ^ { p } = : L$ is equivalent to $\Lambda ^ { p } M = M ( \Lambda ^ { t } ) ^ { p }$ or, equivalently,
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013061.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td style="width:94%;text-align:center;" valign="top"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013061.png"/></td> </tr></table>
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013062.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} y _ { 1 } , \dots , \hat{y} _ { p } , \dots ; x _ { p } - y _ { p } , x _ { 2  p} - y _ { 2  p} , \dots ) \end{equation*}
  
The <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013065.png" />-periodic <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013066.png" />-Toda system is a <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013067.png" />-Toda lattice such that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013068.png" />. One can of course consider more than one reduction at a time. For example, the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013070.png" />-periodic triagonal Toda lattice [[#References|[a4]]] linearizes on the Jacobian of a [[Hyper-elliptic curve|hyper-elliptic curve]] <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013071.png" /> (the associated spectral curve) with the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013072.png" /> being essentially theta-functions <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013073.png" /> where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013074.png" /> in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013075.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013076.png" />, the flat coordinates on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013077.png" />.
+
The $l$-periodic $2$-Toda system is a $2$-Toda lattice such that $[ \Lambda ^ { l } , L _ { 1 } ] = [ \Lambda ^ { l } , L _ { 2 } ] = 0$. One can of course consider more than one reduction at a time. For example, the $l$-periodic triagonal Toda lattice [[#References|[a4]]] linearizes on the Jacobian of a [[Hyper-elliptic curve|hyper-elliptic curve]] $C$ (the associated spectral curve) with the $\tau _ { n }$ being essentially theta-functions $\tau _ { n } ( t ) = \tau _ { 0 } ( t + n w )$ where $l w \equiv 0$ in $\operatorname { Jac } ( C )$, $t = x - y$, the flat coordinates on $\operatorname { Jac } ( C )$.
  
 
One can also consider in this context Toda flows going with different Lie algebras:
 
One can also consider in this context Toda flows going with different Lie algebras:
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013078.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} \dot { x } _ { i } = x _ { i } y _ { i }, \end{equation*}
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013079.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} \dot { y } = A x, \end{equation*}
  
where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013080.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013081.png" />, with <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013082.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013083.png" /> being the Cartan matrix of Kac–Moody Lie algebras by extended Dynkin diagrams (cf. also [[Kac–Moody algebra|Kac–Moody algebra]]). The non-periodic case involves <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013084.png" /> being the Cartan matrix of a simple Lie algebra, in which case <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/t/t120/t120130/t12013085.png" />. The former case linearizes on Abelian varieties [[#References|[a4]]] and the latter on  "non-compact"  Abelian varieties [[#References|[a5]]].
+
where $x , y \in \mathbf{R} ^ { l + 1 }$, $\langle p , y \rangle = 0$, with $p A = 0$, $A$ being the Cartan matrix of Kac–Moody Lie algebras by extended Dynkin diagrams (cf. also [[Kac–Moody algebra|Kac–Moody algebra]]). The non-periodic case involves $A$ being the Cartan matrix of a simple Lie algebra, in which case $p = 0$. The former case linearizes on Abelian varieties [[#References|[a4]]] and the latter on  "non-compact"  Abelian varieties [[#References|[a5]]].
  
 
====References====
 
====References====
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M. Toda,  "Vibration of a chain with a non-linear interaction"  ''J. Phys. Soc. Japan'' , '''22'''  (1967)  pp. 431–436</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top">  K. Ueno,  K. Takasaki,  "Toda lattice hierarchy"  ''Adv. Studies Pure Math.'' , '''4'''  (1984)  pp. 1–95</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M. Adler,  P. van Moerbeke,  "Group factorization, moment matrices and Toda latices"  ''Internat. Math. Research Notices'' , '''12'''  (1997)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M. Adler,  P. van Moerbeke,  "Completely integrable systems, Euclidean Lie algebras and curves; Linearization of Hamiltonians systems, Jacoby varieties and representation theory"  ''Adv. Math.'' , '''38'''  (1980)  pp. 267–379</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top">  B. Konstant,  "The solution to a generalized Toda lattice and representation theory"  ''Adv. Math.'' , '''34'''  (1979)  pp. 195–338</TD></TR></table>
+
<table><tr><td valign="top">[a1]</td> <td valign="top">  M. Toda,  "Vibration of a chain with a non-linear interaction"  ''J. Phys. Soc. Japan'' , '''22'''  (1967)  pp. 431–436</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a2]</td> <td valign="top">  K. Ueno,  K. Takasaki,  "Toda lattice hierarchy"  ''Adv. Studies Pure Math.'' , '''4'''  (1984)  pp. 1–95</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a3]</td> <td valign="top">  M. Adler,  P. van Moerbeke,  "Group factorization, moment matrices and Toda latices"  ''Internat. Math. Research Notices'' , '''12'''  (1997)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a4]</td> <td valign="top">  M. Adler,  P. van Moerbeke,  "Completely integrable systems, Euclidean Lie algebras and curves; Linearization of Hamiltonians systems, Jacoby varieties and representation theory"  ''Adv. Math.'' , '''38'''  (1980)  pp. 267–379</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a5]</td> <td valign="top">  B. Konstant,  "The solution to a generalized Toda lattice and representation theory"  ''Adv. Math.'' , '''34'''  (1979)  pp. 195–338</td></tr></table>

Revision as of 15:31, 1 July 2020

There are many Toda systems spawned by Toda's nearest neighbour linking of anharmonic oscillators on the line [a1]. A convenient container is the $2$-Toda system, first introduced and studied comprehensively in [a2]; see also [a3].

Let $M$ be a bi-infinite or semi-infinite matrix flowing as follows ($\Lambda = \Lambda _ { i , j } = \delta _ { i + 1 , j }$, the shift operator):

\begin{equation*} \frac { \partial M } { \partial x _ { n } } = \Lambda ^ { n } M , \end{equation*}

\begin{equation*} \frac { \partial M } { \partial y _ { n } } = - M ( \Lambda ^ { t } ) ^ { n }, \end{equation*}

$n = 1,2 , \dots$, with Borel decomposition

\begin{equation*} M = S _ { 1 } ^ { - 1 } S _ { 2 }, \end{equation*}

where $S _ { 1 }$ and $S _ { 2 } ^ { t }$ are lower triagonal and $\operatorname {diag} ( S _ { 1 } ) = I$.

Define

\begin{equation*} ( L _ { 1 } , L _ { 2 } ) = ( S _ { 1 } \Lambda S _ { 1 } ^ { - 1 } , S _ { 2 } \Lambda ^ { t } S _ { 2 } ^ { - 1 } ); \end{equation*}

then

\begin{equation*} \frac { \partial L _ { i } } { \partial x _ { n } } = [ ( L _ { 1 } ^ { n } ) _ { + } , L _ { i } ], \end{equation*}

\begin{equation*} \frac { \partial L _ { i } } { \partial y _ { n } } = [ ( L _ { 2 } ^ { n } ) _ { - } , L _ { i } ], \end{equation*}

$i = 1,2$; $n = 1,2 , \dots$, with eigenvectors ($[ \alpha ] = ( \alpha , \alpha ^ { 2 } / 2 , \alpha ^ { 2 } / 3 , \ldots )$, $\chi ( z ) = ( z ^ { n } ) _ { n \in \mathbf{Z} }$):

\begin{equation*} \Psi _ { 1 } ( z ) = e ^ { \sum _ { 1 } ^ { \infty } x _ { i } z ^ { i } } S _ { 1 } \chi ( z ) = \end{equation*}

\begin{equation*} = \left( \frac { e ^ { \sum _ { 1 } ^ { \infty } x _ { i } ^ { i } z ^ { i } } \tau _ { n } ( x - [ z ^ { - 1 } ] , y ) z ^ { n } } { \tau _ { n } ( x , y ) } \right) _ { n \in \mathbf{Z} } , \Psi _ { 2 } ( z ) = e ^ { \sum _ { 1 } ^ { \infty } y _ { i } z ^ { - i } } S _ { 2 } \chi ( z ) = \end{equation*}

\begin{equation*} = \left( \frac { e ^ { \sum _ { 1 }^{\infty} y _ { i } z ^ { - i } } \tau _ { n + 1 } ( x , y - [ z ] ) z ^ { n } } { \tau _ { n } ( x , y ) } \right) _ { n \in \mathbf{Z} } , ( L _ { 1 } , L _ { 2 } ) ( \Psi _ { 1 } ( z ) , \Psi _ { 2 } ( z ) ) = ( z , z ^ { - 1 } ) ( \Psi _ { 1 } ( z ) , \Psi _ { 2 } ( z ) ), \end{equation*}

\begin{equation*} \frac { \partial \Psi _ { i } } { \partial x _ { n } } = ( L ^ { n _ { 1 } } ) _ { + } \Psi _ { i } , \frac { \partial \Psi _ { i } } { \partial y _ { n } } = ( L _ { 2 } ^ { n } ) _ { - } \Psi _ { i }, \end{equation*}

$i = 1,2$; $n = 1,2 , \dots$.

Let

\begin{equation*} W _ { 1 } = S _ { 1 } e ^ { \sum _ { 1 } ^ { \infty } x _ { k } \Lambda ^ { k } }, \end{equation*}

\begin{equation*} W _ { 2 } = S _ { 2 } e ^ { \sum _ { 1 } ^ { \infty } y _ { k } ( \Lambda ^ { t } ) ^ { k } }; \end{equation*}

the crucial identity

\begin{equation*} W _ { 1 } ( x , y ) W _ { 1 } ( x ^ { \prime } , y ^ { \prime } ) ^ { - 1 } = W _ { 2 } ( x , y ) W _ { 2 } ( x ^ { \prime } , y ^ { \prime } ) ^ { - 1 } \end{equation*}

is equivalent to the bilinear identities for the tau-functions

\begin{equation*} \oint _ { z = \infty } \tau _ { n } ( x - [ z ^ { - 1 } ] , y ) \tau _ { m + 1 } ( x ^ { \prime } + [ z ^ { - 1 } ] , y ^ { \prime } ) \times \end{equation*}

\begin{equation*} = \oint _ { z = \infty } \tau _ { n + 1 } ( x , y - [ z ] ) \tau _ { m } ( x ^ { \prime } , y ^ { \prime } + [ z ] ) \times \end{equation*}

\begin{equation*} \times e ^ { \sum ( y _ { i } - y _ { i } ^ { \prime } ) z ^ { - i } } z ^ { n - m - 1 } d z, \end{equation*}

which characterize the solution.

The $1$-Toda system (which can always be imbedded in the $2$-Toda system) is just the $x$-flow for $L_1$, i.e. it just involves ignoring $L_{2}$ and in effect freezing $y$ at one value. This is equivalent to the Grassmannian flag $W _ { n } \supset W _ { n + 1}$, $n \in \mathbf{Z}$, where

\begin{equation*} W _ { n } = \operatorname { span } _ { \text{C} } \left\{ \frac { \partial ^ { k } \Psi _ { 1 , n } ( x , z ) } { \partial x _ { 1 } } : k = 0,1 , \ldots \right\}, \end{equation*}

or, alternatively, it is characterized by the left-hand side of the bilinear identities $= 0$ for $n > m$ and $\mathsf{y} = \mathsf{y} ^ { \prime }$ frozen (or suppressed). The semi-infinite ($1$ or $2$) Toda system involves setting $\tau _ { - i } = 0$, $i = 1,2 , \dots$, and $\tau _ { 0 } = 1$, in which case $\tau _ { n } ( x - [ z ] , y )$ and $\tau _ { n } ( x , y + [ z ] )$ are polynomials in $z$ of degree at most $n$.

The famous triagonal Toda system — the original Toda system — is equivalent to the reduction $L _ { 1 } = L _ { 2 } = : L = L ( x - y )$ or, equivalently, $\Lambda M = M \Lambda ^ { t }$ or, equivalently, $\tau ( x , y ) = \tau ( x - y )$. In general, the $( 2 p + 1 )$-gonal Toda system $L _ { 1 } ^ { p } = L _ { 2 } ^ { p } = : L$ is equivalent to $\Lambda ^ { p } M = M ( \Lambda ^ { t } ) ^ { p }$ or, equivalently,

\begin{equation*} y _ { 1 } , \dots , \hat{y} _ { p } , \dots ; x _ { p } - y _ { p } , x _ { 2 p} - y _ { 2 p} , \dots ) \end{equation*}

The $l$-periodic $2$-Toda system is a $2$-Toda lattice such that $[ \Lambda ^ { l } , L _ { 1 } ] = [ \Lambda ^ { l } , L _ { 2 } ] = 0$. One can of course consider more than one reduction at a time. For example, the $l$-periodic triagonal Toda lattice [a4] linearizes on the Jacobian of a hyper-elliptic curve $C$ (the associated spectral curve) with the $\tau _ { n }$ being essentially theta-functions $\tau _ { n } ( t ) = \tau _ { 0 } ( t + n w )$ where $l w \equiv 0$ in $\operatorname { Jac } ( C )$, $t = x - y$, the flat coordinates on $\operatorname { Jac } ( C )$.

One can also consider in this context Toda flows going with different Lie algebras:

\begin{equation*} \dot { x } _ { i } = x _ { i } y _ { i }, \end{equation*}

\begin{equation*} \dot { y } = A x, \end{equation*}

where $x , y \in \mathbf{R} ^ { l + 1 }$, $\langle p , y \rangle = 0$, with $p A = 0$, $A$ being the Cartan matrix of Kac–Moody Lie algebras by extended Dynkin diagrams (cf. also Kac–Moody algebra). The non-periodic case involves $A$ being the Cartan matrix of a simple Lie algebra, in which case $p = 0$. The former case linearizes on Abelian varieties [a4] and the latter on "non-compact" Abelian varieties [a5].

References

[a1] M. Toda, "Vibration of a chain with a non-linear interaction" J. Phys. Soc. Japan , 22 (1967) pp. 431–436
[a2] K. Ueno, K. Takasaki, "Toda lattice hierarchy" Adv. Studies Pure Math. , 4 (1984) pp. 1–95
[a3] M. Adler, P. van Moerbeke, "Group factorization, moment matrices and Toda latices" Internat. Math. Research Notices , 12 (1997)
[a4] M. Adler, P. van Moerbeke, "Completely integrable systems, Euclidean Lie algebras and curves; Linearization of Hamiltonians systems, Jacoby varieties and representation theory" Adv. Math. , 38 (1980) pp. 267–379
[a5] B. Konstant, "The solution to a generalized Toda lattice and representation theory" Adv. Math. , 34 (1979) pp. 195–338
How to Cite This Entry:
Toda lattices. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Toda_lattices&oldid=13616
This article was adapted from an original article by M. Adler (originator), which appeared in Encyclopedia of Mathematics - ISBN 1402006098. See original article