Elliptic genera
The name elliptic genus has been given to various multiplicative cobordism invariants taking values in a ring of modular forms. The following is an attempt to present the simplest case — level- genera in characteristic
— in a unified way. It is convenient to use N. Katz's approach to modular forms (cf. [a7]) and view a modular form as a function of elliptic curves with a chosen invariant differential (cf. also Elliptic curve). A similar approach to elliptic genera was used by J. Franke [a3].
Jacobi functions.
Let be any perfect field of characteristic
and fix an algebraic closure
of
(cf. Algebraically closed field). Consider a triple
consisting of:
i) an elliptic curve over
, i.e. a smooth curve of genus
with a specified
-rational base-point
;
ii) an invariant -rational differential
;
iii) a -rational primitive
-division point
. Following J.I. Igusa [a6] (up to a point), one can associate to these data two functions,
and
, as follows.
The set of
-division points on
can be described as follows. There are four
-division points
(
is one of them), four primitive
-division points
such that
, and eight primitive
-division points
such that
. Consider the degree-
divisor
. Since
in
and since Galois symmetries transform
into itself, Abel's theorem (cf., for example, [a11], III.3.5.1, or Abel theorem) implies that there is a function
, uniquely defined up to a multiplicative constant, such that
.
The function is odd, satisfies
, and undergoes sign changes under the two other translations of exact order
. Moreover, if
satisfies
, then translation by
transforms
into
for some non-zero constant
. This constant depends on the choice of
but only up to sign. It follows that
does not depend on the choice of
. This constant is written as
, i.e.
![]() |
One also defines
![]() |
(the summation is over the primitive -division points
such that
). If
is one of the values of
, the other values are
, each taken twice. It follows that
![]() |
and
![]() |
It is now easy to see that
![]() |
Using once more Abel's theorem, one sees that there is a unique such that
, and
. Since
, one has
.
The differential has four double poles
. Also, it is easy to see that
is a double zero of
, hence a simple zero of
. One concludes that
![]() |
and that is an invariant differential on
.
A slight modification of the argument given in [a6] shows that the Jacobi elliptic functions satisfy the Euler addition formula
![]() |
Accordingly, one defines the Euler formal group law by
![]() |
Notice that since ,
is defined over
.
The elliptic genus.
At this point, one normalizes over
by requiring that
(the given invariant differential). All the objects
, and
are now completely determined by the initial data. Replacing
by
(
) yields:
![]() | (a1) |
![]() |
As any formal group law, is classified by a unique ring homomorphism
![]() |
from the complex cobordism ring. Since , it is easy to see that
uniquely factors through a ring homomorphism
![]() |
from the oriented cobordism ring. By definition, is the level-
elliptic genus. Suppose now that
. Define a local parameter
near
so that
and
. Then
can be expanded into a formal power series
which clearly satisfies
and
. In this case, the elliptic genus can be defined as the Hirzebruch genus (cf. [a4] or [a5]) corresponding to the series
. Since
, the logarithm
of this elliptic genus is given by the elliptic integral
![]() | (a2) |
which gives the original definition in [a9].
Modularity.
For any closed oriented manifold of dimension
,
is a function of the triple
. As easily follows from (a1), multiplying
by
results in multiplying
by
. Also,
depends only on the isomorphism class of the triple
and commutes with arbitrary extensions of the scalar field
. In the terminology of Katz ([a7]; adapted here to modular forms over fields),
is a modular form of level
and weight
. Let
be the graded ring of all such modular forms. Then
,
,
. Moreover, one can prove that
. If one identifies these two isomorphic rings, the elliptic genus becomes the Hirzebruch genus
![]() |
with logarithm given by the formal integral (a2).
Integrality.
Consider
![]() |
i.e., the composition of with the forgetful homomorphism
. As is shown in [a2],
![]() |
The ring agrees with the ring
of modular forms over
. Thus: If
is a
-manifold of dimension
, then
.
Example: the Tate curve.
Let be a local field, complete with respect to a discrete valuation
, and let
be any element satisfying
. Consider
. It is well-known (cf. [a11], § C.14) that
can be identified with the elliptic curve (known as the Tate curve)
![]() |
where
![]() |
![]() |
can be treated as an elliptic curve over
with
. Fix the invariant differential
(
) on
(
corresponds to the differential
on the Tate curve).
has three
-rational primitive
-division points:
,
and
. To describe the corresponding Jacobi function
, consider the theta-function
![]() |
This is a "holomorphic" function on with simple zeros at points of
(cf. [a10] for a justification of this terminology), satisfying
![]() |
Consider the case where . Let
be any square root of
, and let
![]() | (a3) |
![]() |
is a meromorphic function on
satisfying
and
![]() |
![]() |
i.e., is a multiple of the Jacobi function
of
.
Notice now that the normalization condition can be written as
, where
is the derivative with respect to
. Since
, one has
. Differentiating (a3), one obtains
![]() |
![]() |
and
![]() |
Finally, if , the function
satisfies
. It follows that the generating series
is given by
![]() |
![]() |
The cases where or
are treated similarly, with
![]() |
and
![]() |
respectively.
Strict multiplicativity.
The following theorem, also known (in an equivalent form) as the Witten conjecture, was proven first by C. Taubes [a12], then by R. Bott and Taubes [a1]. Let be a principal
-bundle (cf. also Principal
-object) over an oriented manifold
, where
is a compact connected Lie group, and suppose
acts on a compact
-manifold
. Then
![]() |
For the history of this conjecture, cf. [a8].
References
[a1] | R. Bott, C. Taubes, "On the rigidity theorems of Witten" J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 2 (1989) pp. 137–186 |
[a2] | D.V. Chudnovsky, G.V. Chudnovsky, P.S. Landweber, S. Ochanine, R.E. Stong, "Integrality and divisibility of the elliptic genus" Preprint (1988) |
[a3] | J. Franke, "On the construction of elliptic cohomology" Math. Nachr. , 158 (1992) pp. 43–65 |
[a4] | F. Hirzebruch, "Topological methods in algebraic geometry" , Grundlehren math. Wiss. , Springer (1966) (Edition: Third) |
[a5] | F. Hirzebruch, Th. Berger, R. Jung, "Manifolds and modular forms" , Aspects of Mathematics , E20 , Vieweg (1992) (Appendices by Nils-Peter Skoruppa and by Paul Baum) |
[a6] | J.-I. Igusa, "On the transformation theory of elliptic functions" Amer. J. Math. , 81 (1959) pp. 436–452 |
[a7] | N.M. Katz, "![]() |
[a8] | P.S. Landweber, "Elliptic genera: An introductory overview" P.S. Landweber (ed.) , Elliptic Curves and Modular Forms in Algebraic Topology (Proc., Princeton 1986) , Lecture Notes in Mathematics , 1326 , Springer (1988) pp. 1–10 |
[a9] | S. Ochanine, "Sur les genres multiplicatifs définis par des intégrales elliptiques" Topology , 26 (1987) pp. 143–151 |
[a10] | P. Roquette, "Analytic theory of elliptic functions over local fields" , Hamburger Math. Einzelschrift. , 1 , Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht (1970) |
[a11] | J.H. Silverman, "The arithmetic of elliptic curves" , GTM , 106 , Springer (1986) |
[a12] | C. Taubes, "![]() |
Elliptic genera. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Elliptic_genera&oldid=12287